Starved we are for d prospects that we put a 24 year old D with a relative safe floor over a prospect with a very high offensive ceiling.
Which prospect is that? Spacek?
Between Samberg and Harkins. Went with Harkins because just too little is known about Samberg.
Less being known is what in part makes his ceiling so high.
Less being known changes the kurtosis of the possibility curve, and expands out. It doesn't shift the possibility curve.
Less being known is what in part makes his ceiling so high.
Less being known changes the kurtosis of the possibility curve, and expands out. It doesn't shift the possibility curve.
I'd vote Comrie but it's a wasted vote at this point. Between Spacek and Harkins. I see a much higher offensive ceiling in Spacek. Harkins likely bottom 6 ceiling at best. Went with Spacek, hes the better offensive player and the only one with what I think could be top 9 potential between the two.
Starved we are for d prospects that we put a 24 year old D with a relative safe floor over a prospect with a very high offensive ceiling.
Thats my thoughts too. I think Spaceks potential far out-trumps either Niku or Poolman but given we need D-men so bad, I hope I'm wrong
Thats my thoughts too. I think Spaceks potential far out-trumps either Niku or Poolman but given we need D-men so bad, I hope I'm wrong
So it is about nothing but ceilings?
Spacek might have about a 20-30% chance of becoming an NHL regular. Poolman is more like 60-80%. There may be very little chance that he rises above 3rd pair but there is very good chance that he makes it that far. (all probabilities based on careful analysis of the quantum of their skating mechanics )
It isn't like Spacek has 1st line ceiling and his 2nd line potential probably isn't any higher than Poolman's 2nd pair probability. So ceilings aren't actually much different although Spacek on the 3rd line probably scores about double what Poolman scores on the 3rd pair.