TennisMenace
Registered User
I doubt he plays except possibly in Boston. Boston usually likes to goon it up at home more than on the road.
Will Parros play again?
- Thread starter ForsbergForever
- Start date
Your opinion is ridiculous. The Emelin thing happened during the 3rd shift of the game. You really think Chara is going to do something different if a plug goon is sitting on the bench? You think he's scared of that?
In my opinion Boston would have done more shananigans to try to persuade Therrien to play Parros more, becuase, as has been mentioned many times, Parros is a terrible hockey player. Boston wants Parros in the lineup and wants him gettng as much ice time as humanly possible.
It's my opinion that Boston would have won 3-1 if Parros was in the lineup, and Parros would have been -2 in about 4 inutes of ice time.
Chara's not going to fight Parros. Neither is Lucic. So what's the point of having Parros in the lineup?
attachetatuque
un gros bonhomme!
pleeeeeease Bergy! doesn't seem to be that bad of a hockey player either. Can't be any worse than Parros
Good ****ing riddance (the player not the person). Can we just realize that "goons" should not play in the Nhl anymore? Like a previous poster said, what Parros would have done against Boston? He would have fight Thornton then nothing else. Whoooooohooooooo big ****ing deal.
We didn't get physically dominated against them, their 5v5 was just 10times better.
We didn't get physically dominated against them, their 5v5 was just 10times better.
we didnt ? our one tough guy got clocked, after the hip check lucic was running emelin every chance then plastered Weaver behind the goal line, soderberg ( if I remember right) with no incentive from the defense RAN budaj at the top of the crease with no response. Chara cross checks gallagher after the whiste then laughs it off, thorton gets all handsy with markov and jonny boychuck tangles with our norris winning defenseman drops the gloves throws subban to the ice and how did we respond ?
After the goal the habs played tentative the rest of the night and were clearly on the short end of the physical play.
I'm not saying they are equivalent but if moen had tangled with bergeron and did what boychuck did to subban, you think moen gets to skate to the box and sit his 2 in complete peace ?
Let's say Parros was there. What would he have done? Did you see Thornton that night? And all theses things you said, the Habs got a PP on every single occasion but couldn't do ****.
Chara afraid of Parros... ha ha ha
Chara isn't afraid of anyone. Maybe John Scott, but even then why on earth would he drop them against him ?
Parros doesn't scare anyone anymore, everybody knows he's one concussion away to eat threw a straw for the reminder of his life, I sure hope he'll retire after the season and keep his remaining brain cells healthy.
This team wins against the mighty goon squads of Toronto, Boston and Buffalo (sic) without Parros or a fighter in the lineup, yet some crazy fighting loving idi*** still whine about not having an enforcer in the lineup... as if what ? We would have win with a wider margin ??
Really
Chara afraid of Parros... ha ha ha
Chara isn't afraid of anyone. Maybe John Scott, but even then why on earth would he drop them against him ?
Parros doesn't scare anyone anymore, everybody knows he's one concussion away to eat threw a straw for the reminder of his life, I sure hope he'll retire after the season and keep his remaining brain cells healthy.
This team wins against the mighty goon squads of Toronto, Boston and Buffalo (sic) without Parros or a fighter in the lineup, yet some crazy fighting loving idi*** still whine about not having an enforcer in the lineup... as if what ? We would have win with a wider margin ??
Really
Our win% is way higher without Parros than with him. But i guess it doesn't matter because hockey is all about " not getting intimated" and not winning.
People have just not clue on what is going on.
Parros is pretty much done like dinner. He should protect that Princeton educated brain and call it a career after this season. A smart guy like Parros would have smartly invested his career earnings (5.6 mil) and shouldn't be hurting for money. With his education, he should be a shoe in for some hockey related career after retiring as a player.
hockey is about winning in the playoffs, where the intensity goes up and the whistles go away.
Is the thought that we had the best winning percentage in the east last year before being handily dispatched by the sens, does that thought keep you warm at night ?
but sure lets go for a repeat, or a three peat. i'm sure THIS time it will be different.
We dominated the Sens but Anderson was just stopping everything and Price was terrible. Also Parros wouldn't have played A SINGLE game in the playoffs last year.
What's the relevance of this? Everyone keeps saying we got Parros for the regular season and he won't play in the playoffs?
The Habs muffled Boston despite having only 10 forwards for most of the game. If Parros had played the Habs would in effect have been down to 9. So why couldn't Parros have been Gordie Howe?
Mr Hab said:
Parros didn't play in the last game against Boston either, for the record.
You guys might both want to review the Dec 5th game. One shift: Hamilton boards Prust, Moen enquires but Hamilton not interested, Thornton then goes after Prust and they fight. Parros skating around on the ice the whole time doing nothing.
Even though Parros really can`t fight much do to his health situation, just his presence against the Boston GOONS keeps the Thorton`s Lucic and Chara`s in check....First two games this year with Perros in the pinup those guys played like little choir boys......SAINTS......NO GOONING......take him out and the goons come out to play.....AND I think Perros CAN contribute hockey wise, the guy can play hockey and when he decides to go to the net there`s no stopping him....Bruins use Chara on the PP to stand in front of the net, SO why don`t we do the same with Charra ????? They`re paying him so why not use him ? I don`t get it.
