MarkusNaslund19
Registered User
- Dec 28, 2005
- 5,475
- 7,850
May seem like a random comparison, but he reminds me a little bit of Atkinson though he's slower and has a better shot.
My question basically has to do with career value. Atkinson has had good years and mediocre years. At the end of it all, do you think Caulfield will be better?
For the record, I think Caulfield will be a good player, but I predict he will be slightly worse than Atkinson (which is really no slight).
My question basically has to do with career value. Atkinson has had good years and mediocre years. At the end of it all, do you think Caulfield will be better?
For the record, I think Caulfield will be a good player, but I predict he will be slightly worse than Atkinson (which is really no slight).