Who was Pittsburgh's stud D-man in 2017?
Please, we lost to your Bruins in 7 and then you lost in 5 because nobody outside your first line could score. In games 2-5, David Krejci was the only Bruin forward not named Marchand, Bergeron, or Pastrnak to score. It's hilarious that you would call us top heavy while you've got the most dominant 1st line in the league and ended up losing lost because of your depth. The Bruins let in 39 goals in 11 games, please don't bother lecturing us on how bad our defense is, especially since we allowed fewer goals than the Caps in the regular season. It's absolutely shocking that your top line lit us up, oh wait, they combined for 23 points against the Lightning too. I bet you're not posting about how bad the Lightning's D is.
And if you want to read up on the Leafs cap situation there has been about a dozen articles posted and hundreds of pages on the mainboards about that very topic. Perhaps you should read some and see why the Leafs will be totally fine handing out those serious contracts.
Is this a case one of the many Leaf fans who have been helping the cup parades down Yonge Stree every season they start off with a Win. If you don't think you are top heavy have Tavares, Matthews, Marner, Nylander, Kadri, Marleau etc. you may not watch any other teams play.
Not sure how the Bruins come into play here - I mean the original post was indicating being top heavy and moving a forward for a Stud D man and making sure they don't run into cap issues - I guess those points may have been missed.
Talking about a Bruins top line that lit the Leafs up....sure, that doesn't excuse the fact you need help on D.... Yes the Bruins gave up goals for sure....but I never made a claim that they had a Stud D man that was taking them to the cup finals.... I actually think they over performed last year....so its a moot point.
Talking about the Penguins is talking about the outlier not the normal - not to mention Letang is not what I would call a bad D man, and truth be told Hainsey one of your better playoff D men played for the Penguins. But again even if you consider their D and Letang to be crap (which is pretty naive), their case can also be made with having the best player in hockey for many years - but again I reiterate they are more the outlier than the norm - however had a decent D corps.
You are right I dont post about how bad the Lightning D men are because if you missed it, they had a stud D man....who may have also won the Norris this year - you can look him up, his name is Hedman... again you prove my point about having D help you win cups.
As for the cap - yes many articles about cap space - for ease of numbers lets do a quick break down with assumptions for next years Leaf contracts:
Tavares - 11 Million
Matthews - 11 Million
Marner - 8 million
Nylander - 7 Million
Marleau - 6 Million
43 Million tied up to 5 Forwards (granted Marleau only has one more year after this year) - those 5 players consume 55% of the cap space of a 23 man roster. So as I said before, the Leafs will want to make sure they can stay ahead of putting themselves into cap purgatory.
At the end of the day its a team game, won by a team and lost by a team - however if you watch many teams that have won cups previously they have had Stud D man playing or a very hot goalie (which can be a reflection of the D as well).
But again its hard to talk to many Leaf fans as they treat anything said about their team as sacrilegious unless it implies they are the greatest. If people are offended that the notion of trading Marner for a stud D man is upsetting...well thats music to my ears because you have the debatably the best Center tandem in hockey which will wreck havoc on other teams, and its nice to see that the D situation is still lacking a little so other teams have a chance.