Todd1a
Kucherov or prospect
With our salary cap problems why did steve yzerman pay coburn 3.7 per year for three years ?
Just seems with koekkoek in our system and deangelo we could have passed on coburnBecause fire Yzerman, that's why.
Top 4 defensemen don't grow on trees and he's actually cheap. We might hate the last year of that deal though.
Just seems with koekkoek in our system and deangelo we could have passed on coburn
because of growth and work of the younger guys he played with
i get that but he was bad in playoffs I think if could find a couple cheaper options him and garrison both could move
thing is we like the long sticks of the bigger guys just coburn isnt so great
he did a great job in growth of both nesterov and sustr though imo
I guess but I took it as yzerman choose coburn over garrison which has me
Thinking ugh why? Maybe Stevie thinks coburn won't get drafted in expansion and garrison would have ? Idk ? Unless Stevie thought odds are I can't sign Stamkos long term anyway?
might be simpler lefty righty
With Coburn taking 800k less it makes Carle's buyout roughly only 1mil which is easy to handle. He can play on any pairing on either the left or right side and was our most used PKer from what I remember so he does the heavy lifting, you won't find that in the UFA market for 3.7.
With our salary cap problems why did steve yzerman pay coburn 3.7 per year for three years ?
I don't mind Coburn, usually pretty solid. Big body and veteran guy. Him and Koekoek played well together, Coburn is more of a stay home guy and allowed Koekkoek to go for some skates and take the puck and go. He took a discount to stay in Tampa too so thats a plus.
Coburn and Garrison, Gary being the better of the two, are both welcome in my opinion!!
Hose likes a Lightning player ? Huh !
Ya but I feel yzerman moves garrison and keeps coburn so why did yzerman choose coburn over garrison is beyond me?
I did not know he was trying to get coburn for that long wow. But nowI can't see yzerman dealing carle and not retain any salary. In fact it looks like we could use that coburn 3.7 cap room right now. Unless in fact yzerman feels Stamkos is as good as gone.Yzerman had been trying to get Coburn for several years, before he actually acquired him. Did you think he was going to let him walk after dealing significant assets for him? I knew he'd be resigned, and he's on a good deal.
His size/speed combination is a great asset and he's got excellent shutdown capability. He'll be a boon for the defense by covering for Koekkoek once he emerges as a top 4 PMD.
I do think Garrison could potentially be traded, but not until Koekkoek emerges as a legit #3, which he hasn't. Right now the best we can hope for is that Yzerman can find a way to deal Carle and not retain salary. That gives us the best possible group of defensemen. I wouldn't rule out dealing Sustr and coping with Carle if a favorable trade isn't possible.
DeAngelo by all accounts isn't close to being ready and has been a liability in Syracuse. That's a decision for a much later date.
With the set backs DeAngelo is having keeping some vets around isn't a bad idea. You still have Koekkoek who is breaking out and looks like a stud, a few more years when DeAngelo develops and some of the vets exit the D should still be fine.
Hedman, Koekkoek, DeAngelo is still a solid defensive core, given theres no setbacks on development