Hockeyholic
Registered User
Was the Erat Forsberg trade the straw that broke the camel's back? Missing the postseason? Overall underachieving?
I don't know.
But everyone involved is very happy about it now.
To be frank, I really think not giving up some futures for Pronger was a bad decision on his part. Pronger was definitely the time of player that would have tilted the ice for Washington. Couple of years later, he trades Forsberg for Erat, go figure. I would think he made too many knee-jerk reaction type moves and as a result, he got canned.
Given the condition that Pronger was in at the time of the trade, in comparison to how good Carlson, Alzner and Varlamov are at their best so far, not sure the trade is all that lopsided. A bit, sure and not by a mile IMO. Given the fact that none of those players were anywhere near as good at the time and Washington already having a great roster.... Even in hind-sight I think it was an opportunity missed.
im not really sure what your talking about. if they added pronger, the defense looks like this
Green-Schultz
Pronger-Poti/Sloan
Morrisonn-Erskine
mix and match if you want, green and schultz arent defenders, they are forwards playing defense. erskine was basically useless, poti was injured so tyler sloan was in
compare it to now:
niskanen-orlov
carlson-kempny
djoos-orpik
McPhee, if I recall correctly (Correct me if I'm wrong) declined to trade for Pronger at the deadline going into 09 playoffs, no? They also had Fedorov playing on the back-end that year... If I'm correct, you seriously think he wouldn't be a huge boost vs the Penguins that year? I'm almost certain that Washington would have steamrolled Carolina the same way Pittsburgh did...
Was the Erat Forsberg trade the straw that broke the camel's back? Missing the postseason? Overall underachieving?
Yeah dude, a HOF defenseman still playing close to the top of his game would have absolutely made that defense better. Not really sure what you're trying to argue.but your saying that pronger by himself would have made the defense better? cause we saw years of jeff schultz and mike green wayyyy out of position and not playing defense
but your saying that pronger by himself would have made the defense better? cause we saw years of jeff schultz and mike green wayyyy out of position and not playing defense
He sucked
Makes all the Gm's in league look like fools by drafting their discarded players and making Stanley Cups Finals with them in 1 year. Looks like a genius now.
im not really sure what your talking about. if they added pronger, the defense looks like this
Green-Schultz
Pronger-Poti/Sloan
Morrisonn-Erskine
mix and match if you want, green and schultz arent defenders, they are forwards playing defense. erskine was basically useless, poti was injured so tyler sloan was in
compare it to now:
niskanen-orlov
carlson-kempny
djoos-orpik
This narrative has gotten old frankly, mainly because its BS. In the past teams basically only had to expose scraps to expansion teams, this go around some teams had to make some difficult choices. Nashville didnt want to get rid of James Neal, heck Poile even tried to work out a deal to keep him.Makes all the Gm's in league look like fools by drafting their discarded players and making Stanley Cups Finals with them in 1 year. Looks like a genius now.