Sticksandsun
Registered User
- Mar 11, 2015
- 1,961
- 3,926
They beat 3 teams you could argue were better than Vegas but the Finals were not very close. Thoughts?
Surprised at the people saying a break was the reason. Like originally I thought the break would help because Lu but obviously (despite what we were told) he wasn't coming back but I don't see how at that point a break wouldn't help. Like would it have been better Vegas won in 5 so the serious wasn't pushed back? I think Vegas playing more games should have helped Florida
Sorry what i meant was when Vegas was up 3-0 Dallas won a couple which pushed the Finals back 4 days. Would people have rather had Vegas sweep so the series was May 29th? I think Dallas prolonging it should have helped. Suter did cost them a game though lol. They went 2-0 with Benn out and 0-4 with him playing so I think we can blame him not getting suspended longer Although Dallas is very good and my Cup pick for this year so maybe playing them wouldn't have changed anything? Hell of a run though.You can thank Benn and Suter for that.
Yeah this is my checklist as well. Vegas is built for playoff success and even though they haven't been "the favorite" in every year of their existence, no one has ever disputed that. Four big, talented lines that play hard and have traditionally played well defensively. Plus very deep at center. A big, mobile defense that moves the puck very well. I've been saying it for years on here and this is just another example of it, size and defense is still critical in the playoffs. It's just the way it is and it will never change. Once in a while you get an outlier like Colorado but they are the exception, not the rule. And since they have lost Landy, their big power forward and leader, they have gone from favorite status to hopeful status.(1) One of longest times off in NHL history led Bob to fall to earth
(2) Injuries on a not deep team: Montour, Luostarinen and Tkachuk all were severely injured
+ I still believe Tkachuk would have forced game 4 to OT if his Sternum wasn't broken
(3) Vegas is a very good hard team. They bullied us. They deserved to win
Exactly. The long layoff was bad for Bob but our best players needed the break. We would have needed prime Bob and a completely healthy lineup to seriously compete with Vegas. Only in this case we would have had a chance, but we have to be honest to ourselves we would most likely have lost anyway - pulling up 3 major upsets against better opponents is already a miracle, slim chances to pull off an additional fourth.Yeah this is my checklist as well. Vegas is built for playoff success and even though they haven't been "the favorite" in every year of their existence, no one has ever disputed that. Four big, talented lines that play hard and have traditionally played well defensively. Plus very deep at center. A big, mobile defense that moves the puck very well. I've been saying it for years on here and this is just another example of it, size and defense is still critical in the playoffs. It's just the way it is and it will never change. Once in a while you get an outlier like Colorado but they are the exception, not the rule. And since they have lost Landy, their big power forward and leader, they have gone from favorite status to hopeful status.
Zito has been trying to address this and we are a bigger, hungrier, grittier team than we were when he took over, but it's not something that can be corrected in one season.
That's true about the break. We would've been damned either way, kinda funny. Vegas was just stronger, healthier, more durable than we were. It also helps Stone just takes regular seasons off and comes back for the playoffs, basically.Exactly. The long layoff was bad for Bob but our best players needed the break. We would have needed prime Bob and a completely healthy lineup to seriously compete with Vegas. Only in this case we would have had a chance, but we have to be honest to ourselves we would most likely have lost anyway - pulling up 3 major upsets against better opponents is already a miracle, slim chances to pull off an additional fourth.
One bridge too far...
Bob wasn't making the saves he was making in the first three rounds, injuries, inability to adapt. We don't get to the Final if Bob isn't in god mode, not even close, unfortunately he couldn't keep it up and it exposed the team's inadequacies.
Vegas was just really good and they played our style, just better.
we did beat the screw job in every game except the last Canes game so I can't argue thatInjuries. I believe if we were fully healthy we would’ve won the cup
My thoughts without reading what others had responded:They beat 3 teams you could argue were better than Vegas but the Finals were not very close. Thoughts?