I'm not sure if this is correct, but I found a formula for pnep's HHOF monitor, and calculated it for some players. Here are the results:
Neely - 823.5
Gartner - 741
Ciccarelli - 719.5
Oates - 1343
Anderson - 1077.5
Kerr - 582
Martin - 852
If this is right, it is not "concrete" by any means, but it does show some evidence that Neely is above Gartner and Ciccarelli, far above Kerr, fairly equal with Martin, and far behind both Anderson and Oates.
Neely seems to trump his RW peers, except for Anderson. However, cup wins are valued highly in the formula, and that explains most of Anderson's lead. Once cup wins are removed, he is below Neely. I'm not here to pick and choose what numbers to use, so it's only fair that Anderson get credit for those wins.
As shown, Oates is in a league of his own compared to the others, and that is not surprising to me. He should be in the hall.
As for Martin, he played as a LW, if I am not mistaken. LW, historically, is the weakest forward position, and Martin's totals are "inflated" due to his 2 First, and 2 Second team all-star berths. He had competition, but not as much as he would if he were a RW. However, once again, I have to stick to the formula, so Martin is ahead of Neely, but it is quite close.
In conclusion, this shows some interesting numbers for anyone interested in the statistical element of grading a player's career. This is by no means concrete proof, so don't twist it to make it seem like I am treating this like they are indisputable facts.
Neely doesn't look out of place after seeing these numbers. I will not say he is a "strong" induction into the hall, however, I believe he falls in the middle, maybe lower-middle of the pack. That is not a slight against him as a player, because he deserved to have a better fate, due to his great talent, but injuries derailed that.