LGB51
2019 STANLEY CUP CHAMPION ST. LOUIS BLUES!
Maybe we'll get lucky and Nashville will fire their coach then Stillman can hire him. Yes I know highly unlikely.
So people can't voice criticism about either unless they have your blessing?
I advocate for MacLean after the season ends. Can I voice my opinions on Army and Hitch now?
It's not like any of our suggestions about ways to improve schemes or personnel happen anyway. So maybe we should just stop posting all together.Sure. Let's have 2 threads: one just for mindless *****ing and one where we talk about alternative coach/GM options.
I expressed MY opinion, that long-winded complaints advocating firing Hitch/Armstrong don't do much for me if there are no alternatives suggested. We can't build a robot GM, they have to actually hire a real person.
Maybe we'll get lucky and Nashville will fire their coach then Stillman can hire him. Yes I know highly unlikely.
It's not like any of our suggestions about ways to improve schemes or personnel happen anyway. So maybe we should just stop posting all together.
I am pretty sure Army will have to get the boot before Hitch moves on anyway. So do we need a new GM thread too?
I don't really get why you have a bee in your bonnet about my post. I'm trying to encourage a poster to go further with his argument so that we actually have something to discuss. It doesn't bother me if someone wants to use this thread just to vent, but I won't pretend those posts are worthwhile to me.
I've seen complaints about Hitchcock for years now. I've seen calls for him to be fired. Sometimes the complaints are vague and don't really point out what he is doing that should be changed. Sometimes there are no examples of coaches who are better at whatever the deficiency is supposed to be. I just prefer if there was more substance to the discussion. Some posters do that (and then we can dissect the career of whoever it is and see how it stacks up, what their schemes have looked like, etc). Otherwise it feels like a thread where we just complain about the weather.
How many posters watch enough of other teams to bring much of a discussion to the table?
If for example someone advocates for Paul MacLean, how many people would be able to add to the discussion?
I agree on MacLean. Is he involved anywhere right now? I'll be surprised if he isn't hired to coach an NHL team again (Colorado is a team that should hire him today right now.)
Why would you like to see him coached here?
I'm beginning to come around to the idea that we should fire Hitch and hire Easton.
I'm beginning to come around to the idea that we should fire Hitch and hire Easton.
Good article on what Oates has been up to since leaving New Jersey: http://www.thescore.com/nhl/news/835881
Still wouldn't cut him out of the running to be back in the Blues organization in some capacity in the near future.
What are the realistic chances that Army retains Hitch another year? I can just see it now... We make it to the second round of the playoffs and Army calls that "improvement" from Hitch, enough to give it another go
I wouldn't mind that at all. If the Blues dont lose Brad Shaw to a HC job, Oates and Shaw could work well.
I wouldn't mind that at all. If the Blues dont lose Brad Shaw to a HC job, Oates and Shaw could work well.