I kinda like Geekie and he would be on a short list after 10, but you can't take him at 5 with his skating and pace.
I kinda like Geekie and he would be on a short list after 10, but you can't take him at 5 with his skating and pace.
I remain undecided.
BTW, give it what weight you will, but a potential concern re: Savoie:
In Will Scouch's scouting samples, Connor Geekie had superior offensive microstats to Savoie in most categories.
Granted, 7 or 8 game samples, and Scouch still ranks Savoie as the better NHL prospect.
Yeah, Connor Geekie and Cutter Gauthier are names I don't want on my team.Geekie is a terrible name though. His name microstats are trash, his name macrostats are fecal.
I wouldn't say I like him that much. There's a very real chance he's just a 3C. The skating and pace issues are real which is why you can't take him in the top 10, but everything else is there. I mean the bubble season was what it was but that had to have been the quietest PPG season by a 16 year old I can remember.Didn't expect you to like him that much.
Exactly. It does not matter who we draft, the player will not develop into his potential. But whoever we pass over will be awesome.Geekie is a textbook Flyers pick because he's slow. I'm prepared for disappointment.
Kemell's shoulder will be an annual problem if we draft him. If we don't, he will become an all-star. How much you hate Kemell determines whether or not you want the Flyers to draft him.I'm hoping for Kemell because he seems to have the most upside, but I bet the Flyers scouts have him outside the top 10.
Trade back a few spots for Gauthier?Well, during yesterdays conference, the Flyers appear to be looking to trade back. With that said, I am and was fully expecting the worst.