Who should they take? Not who will they take, but who do we want them to take? I am going to assume, because it seems likely that Wright, Cooley and Slafkovsky will be gone in this scenario.
Take the phone away from Fletcher before the draft and don't take defenders, it's f***ed up.
Geekie is a textbook Flyers pick because he's slow. I'm prepared for disappointment.We should all pick a new team at 5 PM
You want Geekie at 5 but are worried about Chuck? I think I might trust him more than you in that case
I want Gauthier, Geekie is insurance.We should all pick a new team at 5 PM
You want Geekie at 5 but are worried about Chuck? I think I might trust him more than you in that case
Cooley and Slavkovsky will choose No. 5 earlierWright will obviously be gone. Of the rest of what I believe to be the top tier:
1. Nemec
2. Cooley
3. Jiricek
4. Slafkovsky
Agreed, but its unlikely, so I took Savoie over Jiricek. An electric scoring winger or C is always useful.From that list, if Nemec is available I take him
C is always better than DAgreed, but its unlikely, so I took Savoie over Jiricek. An electric scoring winger or C is always useful.
Cutter Gauthier is a lightweight version of Mark ScheifeleMy opinion or at least a gut feeling,
Cutter Gauthier is a poor man's Brennan Othman, and guess who drafted Othman, NY Rangers.
So we get Risto instead.......
I picked Savoie, at worst Frost, at best Barzal. I do not think he is Daigle.
But in the end does it really matter for the for-seeable future???????????????
I want Gauthier, Geekie is insurance.
Cooley and Slavkovsky will choose No. 5 earlier
C is always better than D
ok, not always - almost always, 99%. Do you seriously think Nemec or Jiricek is Makar 2.0? Is it funny,Как и в 2017 году