PeterForsberg
Registered User
- Aug 4, 2012
- 1,725
- 297
This year was a weirdly high scoring year and MacKinnon shot high percentage. His team also got the most power plays in the NHL.Mackinnon scores 97
'neither will ever hit 100'
Some of you are incredible
Mackinnon scores 97
'neither will ever hit 100'
Some of you are incredible
97 isn't 100 so as we see it's not a guarantee that MacKinnon hits it even in a year with suspiciously high oish percentages at 5vs5 and PP.Mackinnon scores 97
'neither will ever hit 100'
Some of you are incredible
MacKinnon was on pace to do it last year, but I'm not sure if that was a career year or if that's what we can expect from him going forward.
Matthews still has to show more of a playmaking touch for me to pencil him in for 100+ points. Otherwise, he'll have to score in the 60 goal range to reach 100 points, as so far he hasn't been more than a 40 or less assist guy.
Id bet a lot that a 22 year old didnt have his career yearFor all we know, last year could have been MacKinnon's career year. We'll see this season whether that was the case, or whether MacKinnon's going to be a perennial 95+ point player.
Thats because Babcock is an absolute moron and gives lesser players more TOIThe way the Leafs play and hand out minutes, it would take a miracle for Matthews to hit 100 points. Adding Tavares makes it even less likely that he would ever hit 100. I can see high 80s and low 90s if he plays with Nylander and Marleau but unless Tavares and Kadri go down for a long time and Toronto has no choice but to give Matthews 2 mins on the PP and 18-20 minutes on ES, he’s not going to hit 100.
It’s called rolling 4 lines. Or at the very least 3 with comparable ice timeThats because Babcock is an absolute moron and gives lesser players more TOI
So Matthews should get equal playing time as lesser players?It’s called rolling 4 lines. Or at the very least 3 with comparable ice time
Id bet a lot that a 22 year old didnt have his career year
I wouldn’t do it but I wouldn’t say it’s moronic. Now Matthews not being on PP1 that’s a different story.So Matthews should get equal playing time as lesser players?
That is in fact uncommon.Crosby's career high in points came at 19. Ovechkin's career high in points came at age 22. Malkin's career high in points came at age 22. Stamkos' career high in points came at age 21.
It's not uncommon for elite scorers to have their best years (statistically) at 22 or younger.
That is in fact uncommon.
The studied and average peak of a forward is 26-28, and while there is always the chance he peaked early I would never bet against him growing further.
Not to mention Ovechkin, Malkin, and Crosby are very rare cases. Stamkos is the closest comparable.
Thanks for that. This is why I read these boards for posts like this. I had no idea that elite players peaked so early. It’s probably unique to hockey. I’m thinking that baseball players, basketball players and maybe football quarterbacks peak later but I have no evidence of that.I'd like to see a link to this supposed study, because all one has to do is look on hockey-reference to see what age the majority of the elite players were when they had their career high in points.
Even guys I didn't list who scored at a bit higher age, weren't far off. Tavares' career high is at 24. Thornton *just* turned 26 at season's end the year he set his career high. Jagr's career high was at age 23. Sakic was 26. Yzerman was 23. Etc.
The only players I can think of lately that had their career years later on were the Sedins. Pretty much every elite or star player I can think of had their best seasons (statistically) at or before age 26.