If Ho-Sang and Demko are sitting at 31 which would you take?
If Ho-Sang and Demko are sitting at 31 which would you take?
I hope we can trade up and draft Dylan Larkin.
I like Larkin, I think he goes in that 18-24 range.
Reminds me of TJ Oshie.
I don't think we'll be trading up into the 1st, with second rounders... if we get another 1st, it will involve players.
The 2nd round of this draft is pretty much garbage. The talent falls off a cliff after the top 30ish
39. pick. Travis Sanheim.
I think we should grab one left handed potential top-4 d-man. After Zadorov and McCabe hit the pro team we practically have none left handed d-men in our pool (Brady Austin is the only one). I think we should have at least one in the pipeline in order to have more flexibility in the trade market (some teams might seek for left handed top-4- d-men) - especially if we're to trade Ehrhoff at some point.
He might be available because a lot of the d-men are righties, and they tend to be more attractive.
Here's a nice write-up on Ryan Donato: http://lastwordonsports.com/2014/06/05/2014-nhl-draft-prospect-profile-hm1-ryan-donato/
I've never seen him play, but he seems like a reasonable target in the 2nd. He put up disgusting high school numbers (37 + 41 = 78 in 30 GP), has NHL bloodlines, and is slated to attend Harvard with our own Sean Malone next year.
If think the sabres should package ehrhoff+31/39 to get into the 6-9 range and draft hadyn fleury. your d-core would be set for 10+ years then:
fleury-myers
zadorov-ristolainen
mcabe-pysyk
weber/mcbain/ruhwedel
If such package would be made we would just draft a high ceiling winger like Ehlers or Nylander, no point in getting more defense.
huuuunnnggggh 13 pullups! That's 12.5 more than bennett!!!!!!11!
Obviously Ho Sang's high pull up performance may harm his PUTDP number (Pull Up to Draft Position), whereas bennett's PUTDP will be stellar. I believe PUTDP # will be the new Corsi number and the anchor of all future advance stats!
Who the hell cares about how many more pull-ups they did. SMH.
There will be a few guys at 31 that you wont expect. Most of these mocks only have 2-4 defensemen going in the 1st round and I would be shocked if it ends up like that. There will also be a few teams that will reach on a guy that you wouldn't expect especially towards the end of the 1st (like jfb said about Jake Walman). Then there are the guys every year that are supposed to go 10-20 that fall all the way to the 2nd round. That's going to leave 3 or 4 guys at 31 that you would never expect to be there.
Also this infatuation with Demko is so confusing. I'd be a very sad panda if we took him at 31 or 39 over some of the guys who will be there, even 49 is pushing it.
I definitely agree that more d-men will be taking, and I definitely see teams taking players with a higher ceiling in the mid teens and 20's pick, leaving some players who were "first round talents" available at 31. I believe Demko is a first round talent in this draft(and I don't like taking goalie is the first round) and if available at 31 we should think about taking him. I fully trust our staff to compile a good list and if there is a player that they have ranked higher than Demko available at 31 than take him. But I personally love this kid.
Honestly, ther are not 30 players in this draft with legitimate frist round grades. There isn't likely 20 in all actuallity. However there are 40-45 with second round grades in this below average draft year.
I don't agree. It isn't like last year where you had arguable 1st round players going on seemingly forever, but the 1st round is pretty much 1st round caliber all the way through. When you have a guy like Goldobin probably going in the late 20's then there's solid depth in the 1st round.
I'd say the problem is that there aren't enough guys with 2nd and 3rd round grades, according to experts -- I don't get quite deep enough to have my own opinion on that many guys. The other problem is that there's no elite #1 prospect.