Josh Smith wasn't terrible because of his advanced stats. He was terrible because dude could not choose when or where to shoot to save his life.
The NHL equivalent has to be somebody who shoots all the time despite it being a terrible choice.
Josh Smith wasn't terrible because of his advanced stats. He was terrible because dude could not choose when or where to shoot to save his life.
The NHL equivalent has to be somebody who shoots all the time despite it being a terrible choice.
You understand that shot selection shows up in your advanced stats, right? if your shot selection is bad, you'll have inefficient numbers.
Post previously held by Jason Blake.Josh Smith wasn't terrible because of his advanced stats. He was terrible because dude could not choose when or where to shoot to save his life.
The NHL equivalent has to be somebody who shoots all the time despite it being a terrible choice.
Post previously held by Jason Blake.
Surprised Ovechkin hasn't shown up yet.
What? He has great advanced stats.
Ok, let me state my message again:
Surprised Ovechkin hasn't shown up yet.
Is Josh Smith an MVP calibre player who can put up the basketball equivalent of 50 goals on a yearly basis? No? Thought not. You know nothing about hockey.
People always bring up Ovechkin in discussions about bad two-way play and stuff similar to that. This is a similar topic.
You know nothing about life.
Ovechkin has literally nothing to do about this discussion. The OP literally did not understand why Josh Smith is a terrible player and made an assumption that it was purely based on his advanced statistics when instead the guy keeps on shooting despite it almost always being from a location that he can't hit the shot from or when there's a better passing play available.
Ovechkin does not belong in this discussion whatsoever as it has nothing to do with Corsi or 2-way play and even if you try to suggest that Ovechkin takes too many shots, he is at least the player who is the primary option in this extremely flawed comparison between two vastly different sports.
Do you want to bring up Jay Bouwmester or Travis Zajac here as well while you're at it?
He has the worst shot selection. It's basically the equivalent of a defenseman pinching at the worst times.I believe Josh Smith has one of the worst (if not the worst) 3 pt shooting %'s yet keeps chucking. His long range 2's are also similar. He refuses to adjust his game. He should play off the ball more. In the NHL you would need to compare him to someone who carries the puck too much with poor results. A Scott Gomez type player (the last bunch of yrs).
I want to bring up Jack Johnson.
Okay how exactly is Jack Johnson like Josh Smith? Last I checked, Jack Johnson has nothing to do with poor shot selection and an insistence on shooting the puck all the time. Josh Smith is an example of a guy who can score from one small section of the playing field and then misses everywhere else but still shoots outside his comfort zone. Are you trying to tell me that Jack Johnson goes all Jason Blake and takes low quality shots?
You are literally ignoring what the actual point of the discussion is and just throwing out names that don't belong.
I'm guessing Jack Johnson will be the poster child for this. Rightly or wrongly.
Jack Johnson is probably the easy answer.
Came in to say Jack Johnson, but obviously was already beat to the punch.
Eh, **** off. Three people before me has brought up Jack Johnson in a serious way yet you attack me for bringing up Ovechkin in jest.
Posts #4, 5, and 6 responding to a wrong pretext posted by the OP. People then explained why the topic was wrong and what being Josh Smith actually is. Then for some reason you brought up Ovechkin when he literally does not fit any of the criteria in the thread and was called out for it because of how bad it was.
You're all dead wrong. What's the problem, guys? Don't get the topic?
You're all dead wrong. What's the problem, guys? Don't get the topic?