82Ninety42011
Registered User
Taking EP because even though both are electric in offensive zone Hughes will never get to where EP is in defensive zone.
..but which player has more impact on the ice/game..?..looking at the big picture.Taking EP because even though both are electric in offensive zone Hughes will never get to where EP is in defensive zone.
I disagree. Quinn Hughes plays an incredible possession game and he can play well 22+ minutes a game. He’s not a bruiser or a crease clearer but far more importantly he’s an ice tilter. That’s different to me than say a Krug or a Marc Andre Bergeron, incredible pp qbs who were small.i think there's an argument that hughes is better at his position (ie. a top-5 defenseman) than petey is (borderline top-5 center, but definitely not a top-5 forward) - and that since hughes plays a more important position, it's him.
at the same time - and maybe this is controversial and not giving QH enough credit - but i think that hughes as a small mostly offensively oriented defenseman / pp qb has a skillset where it is easy to find a replacement that is 75% as effective for 50% or less of the cost (ie. tyson barrie), whereas players like pettersson are the backbone of what makes a team tick.
again, maybe not fully fair to hughes, and maybe this is don cherry-esque, but i look at a guy like marner in the same way. he's a hell of a player, and a top-5 winger in the game. but because of *how* he plays (soft, skilled, cerebral), he just isn't likely going to be the backbone of a team.
This is open to question as I see where your going. Hughes does probably control the puck much more and minutes as well. However my thought process is EP is much more valuable without the puck than Hughes but then again Hughes always has the puck so does it really matter. It's a tough question and you really have me thinking here but gonna stick with EP but really they are both teams MVP. You can't go wrong with either...but which player has more impact on the ice/game..?..looking at the big picture.
Yeah..EP slightly edges out QH as having the most talent…but QH edges out EP as having the most impact in the game.This is open to question as I see where your going. Hughes does probably control the puck much more and minutes as well. However my thought process is EP is much more valuable without the puck than Hughes but then again Hughes always has the puck so does it really matter. It's a tough question and you really have me thinking here but gonna stick with EP but really they are both teams MVP. You can't go wrong with either.
Best duo we've ever had talent wise gotta think. Let's hope we can surround them soon enough so we don't waste this opportunity.Yeah..EP slightly edges out QH as having the most talent…but QH edges out EP as having the most impact in the game.
Tough choice.
Not sure they surpass the twins.Best duo we've ever had talent wise gotta think. Let's hope we can surround them soon enough so we don't waste this opportunity.
I knew someone would bring them up. I think the chemistry the twins had was insane and certainly they were talented. However I think these guys might have the edge but I can't argue if someone was to pick the Sedins over EP and Hughes.Not sure they surpass the twins.
I'm happy to tell you we had Sami Salo whose only disability was availability. Still a franchise level D.I'd say Hughes by a very slim margin. However, I do wonder how much the fact that he's the first franchise defensemen we've ever had influences my decision.
I knew someone would bring them up. I think the chemistry the twins had was insane and certainly they were talented. However I think these guys might have the edge but I can't argue if someone was to pick the Sedins over EP and Hughes.
Jamie Benn won the Ross doesn't mean everything. Heck he was even a finalist for the Hart. You have to weigh the competition for those trophy's as well. Not taking anything away from the twins fabulous players and HOF's. You wanna take them as the most talented I won't argue but for me these kids are better when comparing them at the same age. We're lucky to have had all 4.Until the kids win a Hart and/or Art Ross they aren't at the level the Sedins are at IMO
Best player - Bure
Best duo - Sedins
But EP and Huggy certainly have the ability to lead the Canucks to Stanley, certainly the best 2 individual players we have ever had at one time.
He had 99 points while the next Canucks were like 68. I think it would be difficult coming up with a case where he wasn't the best canuck. Outscoring #2 by nearly 50% is impressive.There was a legit case for that in 2021-22