Answer:
So you can say without a doubt that the players ranked 20~25 have definite upsides compared to the players who will be ranked 25~30? Why didn't we just stop the list at 10?
These ranking do not mean anything. If we stop at 25 or stop at 30 makes no difference to this hockey team or the prospects themselves. It is simply something to do during the slow hockey news summer. If we have prospects to rank we may as well rank them. Those that think we should stop at 25 can stop voting in the polls. Everyone is happy.
Yeah, after this thread I plan on making a "HF Vancouver Top 25 Prospects List" thread, and I'll leave the remaining guys in honorable mentions for everyone to finish themselves.
How about we stop at 25 and do a 'Post your list vs. the Board Consensus list' thread instead of continuing? I think that would be a lot more fun than ranking the dregs of the Canucks prospect pool.
I feel that Kenins is the last noteworthy addition. Beyond him, may be Liberati, but I think few know enough about him at this point. That's why we stop at 25 and not 10.
Cool. Have at it. I'm not against others voting for the remaining picks. To me though, it seems fitting to end it at 25, based on the known talent within. That said, I won't begrudge the attempt to rank the rest.
Honestly don't even know who to vote for anymore.
#TeamKenins! Why? Why not!
You myron me brah?
Wellwood you have stopped at 20?
If you want to go to 30, just tally up the runner-ups in this poll. Sauve 26, Friesen 27, Liberati 28 etc
Did anybody else laugh for much longer than you should've?