Toggle sidebar

Prospect Info: Who is the Canucks #25 prospect?

Nuckles

Nuckles

_________
Apr 27, 2010
28,347
3,538
heck
Rank | Player | POS | HT | WT | Shot | DOB | Poll %
1 | Bo Horvat |C/LW|6.00|203| L | Apr 5, 1995 | 64.13%
2 | Hunter Shinkaruk |C/LW|5.11|175|L| Oct 13, 1994 | 32.45%
3 | Frank Corrado | D| 6.00 | 190 | R | Mar 26, 1993 | 48.00%
4 | Nicklas Jensen | RW| 6.03 | 202 | L | Mar 6, 1993 | 56.07%
5 | Brendan Gaunce | C | 6.02 | 215| L | Mar 25, 1994 | 59.52%
6 | Jordan Schroeder |C|5.08|175| R | Sept 29, 1990 | 53.37%
7 | Eddie Lack | G | 6.04 | 196 | L | Jan 5, 1988 | 82.63%
8 | Joacim Eriksson | G | 6.02 | 189 | R | Apr 9, 1990 | 51.88%
9 | Alexandre Mallet |C| 6.01 | 195 | R | May 22, 1992 | 21.43%
10 | Ben Hutton | D| 6.02 | 183 | L | Apr 20, 1993 | 32.08%
11| Henrik Tommernes | D| 6.01 | 176 | L | Aug 28, 1990 | 30.54%
12 | Peter Andersson |D| 6.03 | 194 | L | Apr 13, 1991 | 25.00%
13 | Ludwig Blomstrand | LW | 6.01 | 198 | L | Mar 8, 1993 | 27.21%
14 | Patrick McNally | D | 6.02 | 180 | L | Dec 4, 1991 | 29.87%
15 | Joe Cannata | G | 6.00 | 214 | L | Jan 2, 1990 | 29.93%
16 | Jordan Subban | D | 5.09 | 177 | R | Mar 3, 1995 | 40.74%
17 | Darren Archibald |LW| 6.03 | 212 | L | Feb 9, 1990 | 32.37%
18 | Cole Cassels | C | 6.00 | 178 | R | May 4, 1995 | 45.69%
19 | Evan McEneny | D| 6.02 | 205 | L | May 22, 1994 | 36.46%
20 | Joseph Labate | C | 6.04 | 200 | L | Apr 16, 1993 | 25.23%
21 | Kellan Lain | C | 6.06 | 220 | L | Aug 11, 1989 | 29.69%
22 | Anton Cederholm | D| 6.02 | 209 | L | Feb 21, 1995 | 37.90%
23 | Adam Polasek | D | 6.03 | 207 | L | July 12, 1991 | 49.51%
24 | Alexandre Grenier | C/RW | 6.05 | 200 | R | Sep 5, 1991 | 40.35%


LET'S END THIS, THIS IS THE LAST ONE
Click to read more...
 
Last edited:
Nuckles

Nuckles

_________
Apr 27, 2010
28,347
3,538
heck
Seatoo said:
DO THEM ALL :rant:
Click to expand...

angry-no.png
 
Cogburn

Cogburn

Pretend they're yachts.
May 28, 2010
15,078
4,477
Vancouver
So no love for Sauve here eh? I thought he was added at 20 or so, and thought "well late addition, he'll catch on fast enough".

Whoops, my mistake:laugh:
 
Bleach Clean

Bleach Clean

Registered User
Aug 9, 2006
27,056
6,632
galiano said:
Who cares ?? This is really stupid.
Click to expand...

I think the team has 25 prospects they could legitimately rank. Beyond that though, there seems little point. Up to 25 seems ok for this group.

If Kenins is 25th, then that's a decent crop. Looking at that list, I think 11 of the 25 make it as legit NHLers. Might be optimistic, but that's my guess.
 
settinguptheplay

settinguptheplay

Classless Canuck Fan
Apr 3, 2008
2,629
873
Bleach Clean said:
I think the team has 25 prospects they could legitimately rank. Beyond that though, there seems little point. Up to 25 seems ok for this group.

If Kenins is 25th, then that's a decent crop. Looking at that list, I think 11 of the 25 make it as legit NHLers. Might be optimistic, but that's my guess.
Click to expand...

No point to go beyond 25? Why not? What makes the player ranked 23 or 24 more valid than the players ranked 26 and 27?
 
deckercky

deckercky

Registered User
Oct 27, 2010
9,379
2,452
You could probably continue ranking them until there's a point where a prospect fails to stand out from the pack. Looks like Kenins has #25, and Sauve is likely for #26, so might as well keep going. Or was there other more important business to deal with this week?
 
settinguptheplay

settinguptheplay

Classless Canuck Fan
Apr 3, 2008
2,629
873
Bleach Clean said:
Answer:
Click to expand...

Answer:

deckercky said:
You could probably continue ranking them until there's a point where a prospect fails to stand out from the pack. Looks like Kenins has #25, and Sauve is likely for #26, so might as well keep going. Or was there other more important business to deal with this week?
Click to expand...

So you can say without a doubt that the players ranked 20~25 have definite upsides compared to the players who will be ranked 25~30? Why didn't we just stop the list at 10?

These ranking do not mean anything. If we stop at 25 or stop at 30 makes no difference to this hockey team or the prospects themselves. It is simply something to do during the slow hockey news summer. If we have prospects to rank we may as well rank them. Those that think we should stop at 25 can stop voting in the polls. Everyone is happy.
 

DefMars

Registered User
May 22, 2011
204
0
StrictlyCommercial said:
Kenins and Liberati are the only ones left that aren't busts or close to being considered busts. Past 25 is a waste.
Click to expand...

Ideally I'd like to rank as many as we can. Everyonce in a while there is that one player who seems like who just won't make it but suprises everyone. So it's nice to see a prospect ranked like 27th one year be in the top 10 the next. Obviously its unlikely but i'd like to have them ranked for that reason.
 
Nuckles

Nuckles

_________
Apr 27, 2010
28,347
3,538
heck
If it makes you guys feel any better, the guys who don't make it into the top 25 will be put into the honorable mentions list. Also, people have been losing interest since #20 and I keep on forgetting to put the next one up.
 
StrictlyCommercial

StrictlyCommercial

Registered User
Oct 28, 2006
8,474
1,000
Vancouver
How about we stop at 25 and do a 'Post your list vs. the Board Consensus list' thread instead of continuing? I think that would be a lot more fun than ranking the dregs of the Canucks prospect pool.
 
Nuckles

Nuckles

_________
Apr 27, 2010
28,347
3,538
heck
StrictlyCommercial said:
How about we stop at 25 and do a 'Post your list vs. the Board Consensus list' thread instead of continuing? I think that would be a lot more fun than ranking the dregs of the Canucks prospect pool.
Click to expand...

Yeah, after this thread I plan on making a "HF Vancouver Top 25 Prospects List" thread, and I'll leave the remaining guys in honorable mentions for everyone to finish themselves.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom