Maalaispoika
Registered User
Mark Messier? Peter Forsberg (if you can call him a second liner)? Someone else?
Mark Messier? Peter Forsberg (if you can call him a second liner)? Someone else?
Wasn't Fedorov a 2nd liner (behind Yzerman) 1993-94, when he won Hart, Lindsey, Selke, 1 st All Star?
Henri Richard spent most of his career as a second liner.
Joe Nieuwendyk? Spent a lot of time behind Nilsson and Gilmour in Calgary until they were both gone. Behind Modano in Dallas, and Arnott/Gomez in Jersey.
Henri Richard spent most of his career as a second liner.
Joe Nieuwendyk? Spent a lot of time behind Nilsson and Gilmour in Calgary until they were both gone. Behind Modano in Dallas, and Arnott/Gomez in Jersey.
Nilsson was gone 2 full years before Joe arrived in Calgary.
Given that Hull and Mikita played on separate lines I guess you could call one of them second liners even though they clearly were first line players.
They played on separate lines, but were aways together for most of the PP. For me, that's important when it comes to talking about "second liners." Part of being a "second liner" is that you get less opportunity to score, IMO.
What makes Henri Richard a classic second liner is he didnt play 1st unit PP. Mark Messier was in a similar situation for a number of years.
I completely agree, Richard was the guy that first came to my mind as well. I was just saying that if you are really strict when counting the first line I think one of Hull and Mikita must be the best all time.
Nilsson was gone 2 full years before Joe arrived in Calgary.
Also Joe was #1 early in his career before his knees got blown out.
Gilmour was the #2/checking center while Joe was the 50 goal guy.
nope. Nieuwendyk played less minutes than Gilmour the whole time they played together in Calgary.