torlev*
Guest
How do you explain last year then? We were older, more injured, with less depth.
Zetterberg and Datsyuk got younger?
And the Wings struggled when they hit injuries.
How do you explain last year then? We were older, more injured, with less depth.
Agreed with what you said about the Isles likely to fall because of growing pains. They just don't have the experience in their core to go all the way yet, and they will face growing pains (although it does point to how big it was to bring in two Cup winners right before the season started).
The only thing I disagree with is that winning in OT and SO is luck. I have no idea how winning in OT is luck, but I'd even argue against the SO being "luck" to win. The bottom line is that they have one of if not the best shootout rosters on paper. They are winning them because they are better than everyone else at them. It helps when you can pick high-skilled forwards with a top 10 pick in the draft year after year. The Isles need to get to their seventh shooter (Bailey) before there is some kind of drop-off in my confidence that they can score and he went 3rd yesterday and scored for the winner. That's behind (in no order) Tavares, Okposo, Nielsen, Strome, Nelson, Grabovski. Then you have Bailey, Grabner, Cizikas, and Kulemin. There's 10 players on the forward ranks that have hands and multiple shootout moves. Bottom line is --- they are good at shootouts for a reason.
What IS accurate however, is that this won't work in the playoffs. Doesn't mean it's luck now. Just means they will have to win 5 on 5 in the playoffs, which will be tough for them without the experience.
Leafs.
Habs fall.
All of these are very good teams. Of these though, I’d say the Islanders are most likely to stumble. It’s just growing pains. They’ve got some good young players, but growing pains are likely. They’ve also been pretty fortunate to benefit in a big way from shootouts and overtime. Which is a fair bit of luck. (and yes, some skill too).
Detroit too. Old. An injury or two, and they could suffer. They don’t have great depth, IMO.
Sure, winning in OT doesn't necessarily mean luck. Winning every game in OT certainly requires some fortunate circumstances. You can't be so close with so many teams (i.e. going to OT = close game obviously), and then expect to come out on top in every single OT and shootout.
When games get into OT, I think you’d have to agree, they could go either way. One little bounce, one good play, and it’s over, in either direction. The chances of taking 9 games past regulation in a tie, and winning every single one is highly unlikely.
The top 4 all have a reasonably good shot at winning it all. The rest of them, I'm not sold on.
Ok I see your point. I would expect them to win more often than not because (a) they are a good fast team and 4 on 4 helps them and (b) they are good at shootouts. It's not exactly a coin flip. But yes, winning every single one would be out of the ordinary. It's really exactly the same [in the other direction] of the Devils last year. Devils fans said, we will be better this year because there is no way we will lose every shootout. Yes, losing every single one is a tiny bit of bad luck, but it's also because the team just isn't very good at shootouts. There is a difference between regressing to the mean and suddenly being at the mean.
As for the one little bounce thing, you are also right. But I think it is just a perception thing because our brain focuses on OT stats since they are easily distinguishable. Nobody is discounting other teams that play in close games in regulation. How about teams that are constantly in one goal games, or constantly tied in the third? If team X is 10-2 in one goal games, I should say that is a bit of luck since one little bounce a couple of times can make them 6-6.
I'm being a bit extreme to get my point across. Teams find ways to win. I wouldn't discredit the Kings cup because they won a bunch of games in OT. The fact that Isles find ways to win tight games bodes well for them, not the opposite.
Things are finally coming together for the Isles. I like them. They look good. I think they're fortunate to have the record (points) they do now though, and even if they play just as well as they are now, they may not come out with as many points as they have been.
Young teams also have a tendency to hit skids, that last a little longer than they would with experienced teams.
They’re a young, improving team, I just think, as I say, they could very well hit some “growing painsâ€.
How do you explain last year then? We were older, more injured, with less depth.
Rest assured, us Blues will find a way to fall flat in the first round again.
Even though I'm a Preds fan and we've looked amazing, I am still very uncomfortable and weary about the coming months.