cgf
FireBednarsSuccessor
Eagles already told us that the avs win in 7, and he's from the f***ing future
You should probably learn a useful skill - reading, before trying something more complicated like statistics. Cause if you knew how to read, you would notice that I have ~ 100 game sample size.You should probably learn something about statistics and sample size before you try and draw conclusions from a 10 game sample.
Still no where close to statistically relevant.You should probably learn a useful skill - reading, before trying something more complicated like statistics. Cause if you knew how to read, you would notice that I have ~ 100 game sample size.
If you'd knew more about hockey you would noticed that there is a generally accepted sample size of 82 games.Still no where close to statistically relevant.
Completely disagree, the Avs have been right there in both games. They were the better team for most of game 1 and they were right there with Nashville for all of game two.But I never really felt for even one second they were in those games. The score today was very misleading
Guess you only watched period 1 of game 1Completely disagree, the Avs have been right there in both games. They were the better team for most of game 1 and they were right there with Nashville for all of game two.
Nope, watched both games in their entirety, thanks. I'm not saying the Avs were far better or even deserved to win, but to suggest they were completely dominated simply isn't true.Guess you only watched period 1 of game 1
Nope, watched both games in their entirety, thanks. I'm not saying the Avs were far better or even deserved to win, but to suggest they were completely dominated simply isn't true.
I'm a Wings fan cheering for the Preds, btw, and don't think the Avs stand a chance in this series. Just pointing out the gross exaggeration of the previous post.
Guess you only watched period 1 of game 1
But I never really felt for even one second they were in those games. The score today was very misleading
Lol you can keep saying this all you want but it doesn't make it true.
Avs were the better team for the first 40 minutes of game 1. And the first 20 minutes of game 2. Preds were the better team for Period 3 of game 1 and period 2 of game 2.
The series has actually been quite even so far with the big difference being goaltending. Rinne already has 6-7 highlight reel saves while Bernier has been decent but unable to come up with the big save when needed like Rinne has been.
Lol you can keep saying this all you want but it doesn't make it true.
Avs were the better team for the first 40 minutes of game 1. And the first 20 minutes of game 2. Preds were the better team for Period 3 of game 1 and period 2 of game 2.
The series has actually been quite even so far with the big difference being goaltending. Rinne already has 6-7 highlight reel saves while Bernier has been decent but unable to come up with the big save when needed like Rinne has been.
So earlier you make the "guess you only watched one period durrr" comment, then proceed to post stats from ONE period to prove your point? lolDidn't we outshoot the Avs 8 to 1 at one point of period 2 game 1?
I say neither but if I really have to pick one it's the Devils
If Rinne is the difference in this series, it's the difference between giving the Avs some hope and completely dominating them. He's spotted the Avs a lead from the very start in both games and has an .895 sv%...
The reason the Avs have looked better in the first period of these games is that Rinne let in a goal on the first shot both times. Playing from a lead or behind changes the dynamics of the game, and this particular scenario isn't likely to continue for Colorado.
No, the comments were about Nashville being out played in the 2nd period..So earlier you make the "guess you only watched one period durrr" comment, then proceed to post stats from ONE period to prove your point? lol
Maybe, but offiating isnt gonna change and Bernier is still awful.Lol what? Colorado could’ve won either game if not for the officiating, and Bernier being awful.