He leads the team in goals and points, first time in how many years?
It’s most likely going to be his most scoring season in terms of points since 2010 (crazy)!
His rookie season should get more love. The team was hot garbage with no good defenseman and he was on the top line with Zubrus and Chris Clark.I would say 6th-best or 7th-best, behind 2007-2010, 12/13, 14/15. Not sure about his rookie season.
Kind of gives you an idea how good Ovechkin is/was, if this season is around the median in his 13-season career so far.
#6, but it could move to #5 depending on these last 9 games.
07-08
08-09
09-10
12-13
14-15
17-18
05-06
06-07
13-14
15-16
10-11
16-17
11-12
That one should be 5th at least.
I just fixed the assists of 12/13 and 14/15. It just messed with my head. lolI think close to Top-5. In terms of Regular Seasons of course. More or less successful playoffs (at least EC Finals) may put it even higher, at least higher than 12/13 season, that was a miserable post-season run.
God Tier
07/08: 82, 65+47=112. Hart, Art Ross, Richard, Lindsay
08/09: 79, 56+54=110. Hart, Richard, Lindsay
09/10: 72, 50+59=109. Lindsay
Hartworthy
12/13: 48, 32+24= 56. Hart, Richard
14/15: 81, 53+28= 81. Richard
17/18: 73, 44+37= 81. Richard? Hart nomination?
Good ‘Ol Days
05/06: 81, 52+54=106. Calder
06/07: 82, 46+46= 92.
At least with Richard
13/14: 78, 51+28= 79. Richard
15/16: 79, 50+21= 71. Richard
Learning defence
10/11: 79, 32+53= 85.
11/12: 78, 38+27= 65.
Low point
16/17: 82, 33+36= 69.
P.S. Changed it to tiers, that way it's more accurate.
McDavid will be up there too, don’t worryIt's just another season that will add to his legacy that will rival Marcel Dionne as the best player ever not to win a stanley cup.
Not in any order, seasons that are definitely better:
07/08
08/09
09/10
12/13
14/15
Definitely better than:
06/07
10/11
11/12
13/14
15/16
16/17
Debatable either way:
05/06
Dionne played for one of the worst team in the league. Kings were terrible while Ovechkins Washington has consistently gotten +40 wins most years. If we want a fair comparison era adjustment wont be enough.
I personally also believe Ovechkin is the better player but to say that he is so clear cut better it's not worth discussing is hardly true.
His rookie season should get more love. The team was hot garbage with no good defenseman and he was on the top line with Zubrus and Chris Clark.
McDavid will be up there too, don’t worry
Not really fair to wash when they have to play the pens every yearDefinately unlikely that McD wins as an Oiler. He'll be UFA by the time he's 29 though, and could have a decent chance to sign for that cup-winning team.
Ovechkin on the other hand will be what, 35,36 by the time he's UFA. This was his cup-winning contract, and it's starting to seem like Washington is running out of chances. There's been 2-4 seasons now when Caps "should" have had it, when they have been the best team but haven't been able to clinch. Kind of like Vancouver, although Canucks actually got to a game 7 in their dominating years
Not really fair to wash when they have to play the pens every year
I really don't like this argument. Ovechkin was a 1st overall pick. He went to a terrible team. He was the biggest reason they became consistently good.
Wait... Why?
Well right. But that last bit about Malkin doesn't really make sense with what we are talking about. Washington was bad enough to get to choose Ovechkin or Malkin. Either player would have helped the Caps dramatically.That's true at the same time it isn't. In the season immediately before the lockout season sure, they were the worst, but in the stretch of 5 years prior to him joining they had a 39, 41 and a 44 win season
It is true that Ovechkin is the major reason that they've been a contender, you'd think they could have done well if they had Malkin instead though.
8 years is a long timeIf you're a fan you can't have missed how badly our management has squandered assets and value in trades and signings. We're set so far back it's heartbreaking. This thread is not about us but Ovechkin though.
It's one season a bit disappointing. Chill.If you're a fan you can't have missed how badly our management has squandered assets and value in trades and signings. We're set so far back it's heartbreaking. This thread is not about us but Ovechkin though.
Well right. But that last bit about Malkin doesn't really make sense with what we are talking about. Washington was bad enough to get to choose Ovechkin or Malkin. Either player would have helped the Caps dramatically.
They still weren't anything to write home about in the years prior but you are right that they weren't miserable for ages.