Badger Bob
Registered User
That's a little unfair. Please enlighten as to how many guys touted as franchise players were able to successfully lead their teams to glory at ages 18 to 22? They are few and far between, my friend. Mario Lemieux burned up the league his first four years yet the Penguins completely failed to make the playoffs. Turgeon cracked 100 points at age 20, yet Pat LaFontaine didn't hit that mark until age 25.
Maybe the perspective is different in Western Canada. Maybe Pat LaFontaine got the most out of Patrick Flatley? PL killed penalties as well, which wasn't exactly Turgeon's forte.
And you use Mogilny as an argument, conveniently forgetting that Mogilny, the first ever Russian to play in the NHL, himself had trouble adjusting to NHL play his first couple of seasons. By the time he started figuring out the NHL game, Turgeon was already gone.
Forgot what? Mogilny potted 30 goals in his second season, 39 his third, which was before the arrival of PL. He had the game figured out, and at least an inkling as to how to find the back of the net. In '92-'93, he had 76. So, it could be successfully argued that the chemistry with Patty was what directly led to total. (Andreychuk had a little difficulty keeping up with those two on the fly!)
http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/players/data02/00003762.html
And on a team that also featured Dale Hawerchuk, Dave Andreychuk and Mike Ramsey, why does the burden of the blame for not getting past the first round in the playoffs fall upon the shoulders of Turgeon and Housley?
Who said it all fell on the shoulders of Turgeon and Housley? The departures of Andreychuk, Housley and Turgeon were lamented by few in Buffalo, which made Andreychuk's subsequent return so startling. Nevertheless, Housley and Turgeon, specifically, were symptomatic of what was wrong with the franchise during that era. An old joke went around town that wearing the blue and gold immediately drove up estrogen levels. Turgeon and Housley fit that profile.
Perhaps if he hadn't been saddled with the pressure of being the heir to Gilbert Perreault, and been given a fair chance to develop, Buffalo would've seen the same Pierre Turgeon as Long Island hockey fans.
What makes you automatically assume that there was any pressure? The team had the worst record in the NHL, which led to the first overall pick. Nobody expected an immediate turnaround.
Your orginal comment was to credit him with getting 100 points by age 20 - a threshold he only surpassed one other time - then you turn around and blame the franchise for not giving him "a fair chance to develop."
http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/players/data05/00005495.html
He had played over 4 full seasons for the Sabres, and was given regular ice time on a featured scoring line. The organization decided to make a change, which paid huge dividends by acquring one of the best-loved athletes in Buffalo sports history.
Pierre Turgeon was Alexandre Daigle with a little more desire.
Last edited: