Mr. Make-Believe
The happy genius of my household
...
A LOT of people down on the team right now. I posed this question in... maybe the Gagne thread? But it was an important one, because I keep hearing things about the team like:
- they are too slow
- Rask isn't consistent enough
- our stars don't show up anymore
- our defense stinks
- there's no skill
So I asked... Do you think this Bruins team right NOW is one that could struggle to make the playoffs?
I didn't get much of a response. But surely one would have to agree that the team described above shouldn't even sniff at a playoff berth. I personally think the critiques are overstated.
..........
Where we at? (I'll answer my own questions here, but you can ignore my stuff and just post your own if you wish... The only agenda I intend to push is cutting through the garbage)
- We have a strong core of proven players who I love to root for. We have holes right now at first line RW and top four defenseman. My opinion is that the one at forward is the most glaring. If it is solved, this team will look SUBSTANTIALLY stronger than it currently does.
What is the potential?
- Cup caliber lineup IF something is done to fill the holes. But this team isn't very far from being one that could miss the playoffs either IMO. There is a tipping point for this roster and right now I think they're walking the line between being a not very good team and being what we're used to seeing. I'm not sure there's a place in say the New York Rangers area of quality that the Bruins could sit at. A very good team, or a fairly woeful one.
What needs to be done?
First and absolutely foremost, we have to see if the answer at RW is on this roster. It's not Gagne. It's not David Pastrnak. It's not Seth Griffith and it's not Matt Fraser. It's Eriksson or it's Smith or it's someone else elsewhere. The answer at top four is not Adam McQuaid. I love the guy and he hasn't played poorly. But he won't be able to keep Boychuk minutes and continue to look alright.
What I fear, is that the pairings and the lines we have right now are going to become cemented to some extent. The Bergeron and Soderberg units won't be touched and the second pair ditto. That either a move will be made that brings in someone who doesn't fit and isn't exactly needed OR no move is made at all and this club will continue to struggle.
I'm not doom and gloom. I think this team could be where we need it to without major moves at ALL. But I understand completely where the doom-and-or-gloomers are coming from and that scares me.
A LOT of people down on the team right now. I posed this question in... maybe the Gagne thread? But it was an important one, because I keep hearing things about the team like:
- they are too slow
- Rask isn't consistent enough
- our stars don't show up anymore
- our defense stinks
- there's no skill
So I asked... Do you think this Bruins team right NOW is one that could struggle to make the playoffs?
I didn't get much of a response. But surely one would have to agree that the team described above shouldn't even sniff at a playoff berth. I personally think the critiques are overstated.
..........
Where we at? (I'll answer my own questions here, but you can ignore my stuff and just post your own if you wish... The only agenda I intend to push is cutting through the garbage)
- We have a strong core of proven players who I love to root for. We have holes right now at first line RW and top four defenseman. My opinion is that the one at forward is the most glaring. If it is solved, this team will look SUBSTANTIALLY stronger than it currently does.
What is the potential?
- Cup caliber lineup IF something is done to fill the holes. But this team isn't very far from being one that could miss the playoffs either IMO. There is a tipping point for this roster and right now I think they're walking the line between being a not very good team and being what we're used to seeing. I'm not sure there's a place in say the New York Rangers area of quality that the Bruins could sit at. A very good team, or a fairly woeful one.
What needs to be done?
First and absolutely foremost, we have to see if the answer at RW is on this roster. It's not Gagne. It's not David Pastrnak. It's not Seth Griffith and it's not Matt Fraser. It's Eriksson or it's Smith or it's someone else elsewhere. The answer at top four is not Adam McQuaid. I love the guy and he hasn't played poorly. But he won't be able to keep Boychuk minutes and continue to look alright.
What I fear, is that the pairings and the lines we have right now are going to become cemented to some extent. The Bergeron and Soderberg units won't be touched and the second pair ditto. That either a move will be made that brings in someone who doesn't fit and isn't exactly needed OR no move is made at all and this club will continue to struggle.
I'm not doom and gloom. I think this team could be where we need it to without major moves at ALL. But I understand completely where the doom-and-or-gloomers are coming from and that scares me.