Speculation: What would be needed to move Clarkson?

rdawg1234

Registered User
Jul 2, 2012
4,586
0
He's not getting moved.

Realistically, he's going to play 3-4 years more of mediocre hockey and then they'll buy out the rest of his contract.

He will get a little better though, he's definitely not a 15 point guy, been plagued with injuries, suspensions, pressure etc. this whole year, I expect a 30-40 point effort next year, which while definitely isnt 5.2m worthy, it's better than what he is now.
 

jomas

Registered User
Aug 23, 2008
809
12
snows too much
He's not getting moved.

Realistically, he's going to play 3-4 years more of mediocre hockey and then they'll buy out the rest of his contract.

He will get a little better though, he's definitely not a 15 point guy, been plagued with injuries, suspensions, pressure etc. this whole year, I expect a 30-40 point effort next year, which while definitely isnt 5.2m worthy, it's better than what he is now.

This is how I feel as well.
You never know of course, he might surprise but we'll keep him then, and he'll proceed to drop again.
His contract is just too heavy to move.
 

mikebel111*

Guest
Not going to make judgements after one season.

I think he will bounceback
 

FlareKnight

Registered User
Jun 26, 2006
19,822
1,707
Alberta
If it happens at all it'll probably be salary retention. You should easily be able to find teams that will take Clarkson with a chance to rebound for 2.6 million. Overall it's probably better than the buyout since that will stay on the cap for a longer amount of time.

I want to see him bounce back next year. If he can write this year off and get it together then who knows. That'd be a lot more ideal than having to suffer whatever consequence in moving him.
 

gamer1035

Registered User
Feb 14, 2012
4,191
878
Not going to make judgements after one season.

I think he will bounceback

bounce back to what? hes sucked and been a third liner his whole career. he had 1 fluke season in a 10 year career. You think he will bounce back to that anomaly? Even playing with Kessel he will never hit that fluke season again.
 

mikebel111*

Guest
bounce back to what? hes sucked and been a third liner his whole career. he had 1 fluke season in a 10 year career. You think he will bounce back to that anomaly? Even playing with Kessel he will never hit that fluke season again.

He wont score 30 again.

That is for sure.

However he isnt a terrible player. Just having a bad season. I wont call people failure after 1 year.
 

noBSleafsFAN

Registered User
Jun 13, 2010
642
0
Toronto
He's basically unmovable. Even if management was looking to trade him this early I doubt they'd want to eat half of his salary unless they were extremely desperate.
 

Al14

Registered User
Jul 13, 2007
24,220
5,594
The only way I see Nonis keeping his job is if he's able to dump Clarkson, and his stupid contract, to another team this summer.

Bad contract all around, even at half the price, he's overpaid!
 

TootooTrain

Sandpaper
Jun 12, 2010
35,505
461
What would you need? Half a brain maybe. Got to give him the benefit of the doubt, ie atleast another season for him to prove his worth.
 

darrylsittler27

Registered User
Oct 21, 2002
6,672
1,144
A team called Edmonton.

Edmonton fans are tired of grooming stars and lo$ing them anyway.They would entertain a Clarkson,Orr package for their kids to mature plus a player (Schultz) Gardiner for their pick. IF this team doesn't at least challenge next year for the playoffs, the old boys club may get serverely challenged by the now tired fanbase in Edmontonia. Many of them may even jump to the leafs soon, so long now has it gone on . They know their hockey here, they want results not more potential. We have what they need and we have evolved as a fast transistion(risk taking) team.

Edmonton would welcome Clarkson and he would help(30 pts?) them more than he can help us.We need Kulemin.

In short, it is all about how much we eat and Clarkson just might welcome it as Beauchmin phones and says "Congratulations!"
 
Last edited:

Strategy

Registered User
Sep 8, 2013
521
0
IMO adding a 2nd rnder is enough to get rid of Clarkson, he still has value, just not 5.25mil value
 

oldfan2010

Registered User
Jan 2, 2010
132
1
Muskoka
Clarkson is going through what many free agents go through after signing the big contract. They try to become more than they are to justify the money. Often, in the second year and beyond, they return to themselves and prosper. Let us hope so in this case
 

Al14

Registered User
Jul 13, 2007
24,220
5,594

So, you think the Board is happy with the performance of Clarkson, given his huge pay cheque?

Do you think they'll be happy with the contract demands of other Leaf players that will be pointing at Clarkson's contract? :help:
 

Al14

Registered User
Jul 13, 2007
24,220
5,594
Clarkson is going through what many free agents go through after signing the big contract. They try to become more than they are to justify the money. Often, in the second year and beyond, they return to themselves and prosper. Let us hope so in this case

One can only hope! I would not be opposed to a Clarkson trade this summer. ;)
 

Mess

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
86,984
12,024
Leafs Home Board
Clarkson is not going anywhere.

Nonis is not shopping him and nobody is asking for him and you need two to tango to complete a trade and we're sitting at Zero at the moment.
 

Strategy

Registered User
Sep 8, 2013
521
0
Clarkson is not going anywhere.

Nonis is not shopping him and nobody is asking for him and you need two to tango to complete a trade and we're sitting at Zero at the moment.

I think if somebody asked for him, Nonis would definitely listen.
 

darrylsittler27

Registered User
Oct 21, 2002
6,672
1,144
A mistake is a mistake, own up, move on!

Nonnis has done some good things. People rave about Bernier.Bolland was a good one,injurys aren't his fault. But Clarkson isn't suited for the Leafs, we have to eat some salary and realize Kulemin/Raymond mean more to u$.
 

nuck

Schrodingers Cat
Aug 18, 2005
11,414
2,488
He's not getting moved.

Realistically, he's going to play 3-4 years more of mediocre hockey and then they'll buy out the rest of his contract.

He will get a little better though, he's definitely not a 15 point guy, been plagued with injuries, suspensions, pressure etc. this whole year, I expect a 30-40 point effort next year, which while definitely isnt 5.2m worthy, it's better than what he is now.

^ Agreed. They won't consider dropping the guy after one bad year. No compliance buyouts left so there is no silver bullet, and they still want the type of game he has offered in the past (when producing). He has had off years before and bounced back.

I am not sure he will ever manage 40 points for them though. They haven't made much of an effort to use him the way NJ did (except in his 18pt 10-11 season). If they want him to produce like the previous two years he has to be a pp fixture and the Leafs pp was pretty solid on its own. Maybe the departure of Raymond will open up the minutes for him.

Its bad money for sure though and this surprises nobody except for Dave Nonis I guess. He is unmovable this year. Lose one Komi and pick up another:(
 

Wami

Chicken Lyfe'
Mar 8, 2013
1,106
0
Buy low sell high, not sell low buy high.... we already bought high on Clarkson, moving him now is a double whammy of stupidity, he needs more time
 

likeabosski

Registered User
Jul 31, 2013
699
0
I don't think he'll ever be the David Clarkson we saw in 2011-12 with his 30 goals and the beginning part of 2013 where he was a scoring machine.

Maybe we could get another team to eat 2.625-3m of his salary while we retain the rest.

For those who are wondering how much the cap hit would be if we bought him out between June 15-30 where we get the 2/3rds buyout discount (according to capgeek)

2014-15:* $2,291,667
2015-16:* $1,541,667
2016-17:* $41,667
2017-18:* $41,667
2018-19:* $2,291,667
2019-20:* $3,791,667
2020-21:* $1,791,667
2021-22:* $1,791,667
2022-23:* $1,791,667
2023-24:* $1,791,667
2024-25:* $1,791,667
2025-26:* $1,791,667
Total: $20,750,004 over 12 years
34% savings over his contract ($31.5 million over 6 years).
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad