Did you know they have money on the internet now?
I mean, if Simmons isn't getting riled by these 'internet geeks' he should probably stop getting into public flame wars with them.
Did you know they have money on the internet now?
Did you know they have money on the internet now? Some of these guy are probably making just as decent a living as Simmons, and by working a lot harder too.
sure they are
Simmons has a history of exploiting those who provide confidential information. I dont think the list ends with Reimers mother either...
Working a lot harder to make the same sort of living doesn't seem like a good thing to me. The ideal situation is to make as much money as possible by doing the least amount of work.
Working a lot harder to make the same sort of living doesn't seem like a good thing to me. The ideal situation is to make as much money as possible by doing the least amount of work.
What do you find more appreciable? Being overpaid for lazy sensationalism or legitimate effort and thoughtful contribution?
I appreciate people being paid to do their job. Simmons' job is to be sensational -- that's usually the point of columnists.
I usually find reading Simmons' columns to be less aggravating than reading many threads on HFBoards. If I disagree with him, I usually just think "Simmons is being an ass again" and move on.
Dave "listen to me I'm important" Feschuk
what a goof
Is that something he actually said?
He blocked me on Twitter for posing a question he didn't want to answer. Another overly sensitive soon to be irrelevant member of the media.
Anyone know what article Simmons is talking about where Charron posted his private emails? I want to read it.
yes, that's what happens when you get an actual job. which Steve has had for many years.
Well I guess it suits that a man with an obsolete point of view and perspective be attached to an obsolete form of media in newsprint.
and yet here you sit, talking about him, and he doesn't know you exist.
Don't you know, its not about the quality of the material but how many people will pay attention to it. I won't read his material but I do get a kick out of watching him on TV because he looks like a hamster wearing glasses
My issue isn't Simmons per se, it's those that can't think for themselves, read something sensationalist and generally factually incorrect and use it for months on end as proof of something.I think this is a sensible view. I'm not a fan of Simmons but don't dislike (or like) him anymore than most of the media. I do find him interesting and he's clearly quite bright...just take him for what he is.
Simmons on TV this morning discussion the San Jose Sharks captaincy situation...
"You can't win a Stanley Cup with a goalie named Anti"