Of course, this is purely subjective, and nobody is right or wrong at the present moment. Father time will decide that for us. James Neal is our version of the 90's John Leclair. I don't care if they play the same game. He has fantastic chemistry with an elite centerman (Evgeni Malkin), much like Leclair had with Eric Lindros. Both are big boys on the wing, that possess amazing shots. Neal can play with a chip on his shoulder, but he doesn't use his physicality enough to be a true power forward. Then again, I don't get to see the number of games you get to. I saw maybe a max of a dozen-or-so games, including playoffs. They just simply don't play enough Pens games where I live, but I do see plenty of the Jets being a season ticket holder and all. I am just happy to have a team, even if it's nothing compared to what you guys have. I think he could top out at 50 goals. I mean guys like your Jonathan Cheechoos did it in this NHL playing with Joe Thornton. I don't think there is much difference between a 2005/06 prime Big Joe and a 26-year-old Malkin. I just think it's ignorant to say Neal doesn't have the potential there given his skillsets, and the right chips/environment lined up for him. Not saying it will happen, it could happen.
Having said that, we can all agree that Neal is better than Cheechoo. Granted the 05/06 season was a mess. Many guys, like your Scott Gomezs, Brian Giontas, Eric Staals, etc were producing far above their usual production because of two years worth of rookies filling in roster gaps and many guys trying to get back into game shape/sharpness.