The team we actually have is populated with 3 $11 million dollar players that can’t beat good goaltending in the playoffs.
Goaltenders can impact a game outcome more than any other player. It's just the reality of the position. To put things in perspective, Matthews and Marner lead their team in playoff points and points per game since entering the league, despite being 19-23 years old during that time. During that time, they have faced a higher quality of defense than likely anybody in the league, and an assortment of Vezina winners and playoff goalie record-holders, while receiving very little PP time.
Over the past 3 years, they have faced #1, #2, and #3 in playoff SV%, among all opposing goalies who have played more than one series worth of games over that time. Every single star that faced Montreal this year put up disappointing production, except Nylander. These players have produced in series before in the playoffs against great goaltenders, and have beat the very best goaltenders in the league countless times throughout the regular season. They are also doing very well in terms of actual play and tilting the ice. It's way, way to early to write them off.
Kind of begs the question why are they being paid so much.
Whether you like it or not, playoff production has very little impact on contracts. Available samples vary so significantly, and GMs understand how much it is impacted by external factors, and how difficult it is to compare across teams. They earned the contract valuation they got just like everybody else.
We cannot look past the outcomes because they are the only things that are real.
It's all real. In looking back and determining who won or lost a hockey game, there may be only one specific consideration, but to build a sustainably competitive hockey team with the best chance to win hockey games moving forward, there are many considerations.
If the fancy stats are showing the Leafs to be a good team then that just shows how inaccurate those stats are because the Leafs keep loosing and defying them
Being a good team doesn't guarantee you a win, especially when you're facing even better teams. There are no guarantees in hockey. Let's be clear here - we shouldn't have won the first three playoffs. We were outplayed against better, older, less flawed teams than us, and if anything, we outperformed expectations in taking them to the limit.
So we're actually talking about two series which we arguably should have won; one that wasn't a normal series length, and happened after months of inaction, and one where we lost one of the biggest pieces of our team for the whole series. And both of those opponents received the one thing that can best help a team win when they are being outplayed - objectively outstanding goaltending. Which continued beyond just us.
The stats were not "defied". They explain what happened very well. There are just some people who don't want to accept what happened, and just want to proclaim that everybody and everything is horrible.