vadim sharifijanov
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2007
- 28,872
- 16,378
Wait, on what basis did you make the assumption that Benning is more successful than all of the posters here?
yeah, a lot of us graduated high school.
Wait, on what basis did you make the assumption that Benning is more successful than all of the posters here?
Wait, on what basis did you make the assumption that Benning is more successful than all of the posters here?
I don't personally care about his comments in the 80's. If Detroit found him good enough to hire for 15 years then he's certainly qualified to scout for the Canucks. If you held everyone's feet to the fire over comments made 25 years ago we'd all be labelled something or other. Imagine if our fathers, Grandfathers, friends, family were on record for every comment they made? They'd all be racist and prejudices in some form.
The only thing I don't care for is the direction our scouting is taking. Seems we're going to be heavily focusing on American high schools and American leagues. How come we aren't focusing on our own backyard?
heh, you really have to ask that question? (eg., take a look who's in charge of Western Canada - not that our Quebec scouts have been great either)How come we aren't focusing on our own backyard?
heh, you really have to ask that question? (eg., take a look who's in charge of Western Canada - not that our Quebec scouts have been great either)
Delorme... I'm at a loss for words. Only person in the entire world that prob goes to sleep every night knowing his job is safeIt's mind blowing how many successive management teams we have had have refused to address this issue. And now, the last two at least - Benning and Gillis - have gone on record saying some version of "they haven't been given the right direction". Like it's been a management issue rather than a scouting issue. How many different GMs is it going to take before the change is made? Hell, even an ownership change didn't effect Delorme et al.
Probably off topic for this thread, so I'll stop there. Pet peeve.
I make a good living but I don't even like what I do.
Wait, on what basis did you make the assumption that Benning is more successful than all of the posters here?
Wait, on what basis did you make the assumption that Benning is more successful than all of the posters here?
I feel like Benning is more successful than me because he makes a good living doing what he loves. I make a good living but I don't even like what I do.
It's unlikely to be all of them, but most of them for sure.
well he has a cup ring from that time the bruins beat the canucks, right?
Kevin Lowe has 6. Apparently he also knows a thing or 2 about winningwell he has a cup ring from that time the bruins beat the canucks, right?
Kevin Lowe has 6. Apparently he also knows a thing or 2 about winning
By what metric?
One metric might be the amount of time one spends arguing about life success metrics on an internet forum.
Basically, since you have free time to do things like this, it's highly unlikely you are anywhere near as successful professionally as Mr. Benning.
One metric might be the amount of time one spends arguing about life success metrics on an internet forum.
Basically, since you have free time to do things like this, it's highly unlikely you are anywhere near as successful professionally as Mr. Benning.
And how did you come that conclusion?
Perhaps it hasn't occurred to you that some folks here may have retired from a very successful career and are quite well off? Or maybe you completely ignored investors or perhaps entrepreneurs with self-sustaining businesses who have the time to chat about hockey online?
One metric might be the amount of time one spends arguing about life success metrics on an internet forum.
Basically, since you have free time to do things like this, it's highly unlikely you are anywhere near as successful professionally as Mr. Benning.
No, it did not occur to me. I would think that very successful and professionally driven individuals would not have the time or motivation to argue on an internet forum about subject matter as trivial as this.
I suspect Jim Benning is more successful than 99% of the posters here.
I would think that very successful and professionally driven individuals would not have the time or motivation to argue on an internet forum about subject matter as trivial as this.
Way too many appeals to authority in this thread.
Claiming that Benning is "smarter than all the posters on HF" because he's been part of a Stanley Cup winning management team is the same argument that Kevin Lowe and Craig MacTavish used when they claimed to "know a thing or two about winning."
I suspect Jim Benning is more successful than 99% of the posters here.