dahrougem2
Registered User
Landeskog-Soderberg-Rantanen
Boedker-Grigorenko-Iginla
Matthias-Mitchell-Comeau
McLeod-Skille-Martinsen
Boedker-Grigorenko-Iginla
Matthias-Mitchell-Comeau
McLeod-Skille-Martinsen
Landeskog-Soderberg-Rantanen
Boedker-Grigorenko-Iginla
Matthias-Mitchell-Comeau
McLeod-Skille-Martinsen
I don't think they'll put Rantanen right in the fire but I pray he's not just going to center the 4th line, not sure they even have that luxury right now though. Mitchell is probably still going to play up, maybe Rantanen will be on that 3rd line.
Landy-Soderberg-Boedker
Grigo-Mitchell-Iginla
Comeau-Rantanen-Matthias
McLeod-Skille-Martinsen
That Mitchell line was good last night, not sure I see Roy breaking it up. Not too happy with the above though, not sure how they get around it.
I just...I can't...I mean...
So Mike, it's too much for you to work whatever sources you may have and even just attempt to find out about the severity of MacKinnon's injury?
Landeskog-Soderberg-Rantanen
Boedker-Grigorenko-Iginla
Matthias-Mitchell-Comeau
McLeod-Skille-Martinsen
In all fairness this time I think we should blame Denver Post bosses instead of chambers or Frei. I think people who run DP are just clueless and are only interested about cost instead of giving readers first hand and first quality news.
I don't think they'll put Rantanen right in the fire but I pray he's not just going to center the 4th line, not sure they even have that luxury right now though. Mitchell is probably still going to play up, maybe Rantanen will be on that 3rd line.
Landy-Soderberg-Boedker
Grigo-Mitchell-Iginla
Comeau-Rantanen-Matthias
McLeod-Skille-Martinsen
That Mitchell line was good last night, not sure I see Roy breaking it up. Not too happy with the above though, not sure how they get around it.
This.
Rantanen is a natural winger first, and a Right Winger second. He needs to play on the RW in this stint because he should be playing at his natural and most comfortable position.
He shouldn't even be on LW as others have proposed, and definitely not centering a line as TV proposed. Your argument for not putting him on the top two lines (the fire as you say) is fine but he should not be centering a line, he should be at wing at the very least.
This is what I was personally thinking. If they're actually trying to develop Rantanen at center, then they'll likely start him with two tough experienced guys who Roy trusts defensively. I also doubt Roy will expect much in the way of offense from him.
Especially if Greg and Mitchell's line is not broken up.
Why would they be trying to develop rants at center when his natural position is the position of need? So that he can flip to either at any time? I think that would be a mistake and actually hinder his development. Not every winger needs to be able to play center too. If he is playing center in San Antonio fine but here he should be playing wing imo
That's fine to have that opinion, but if they see potential at center in him with his defensive acumen combined with the fact that hes played center before being drafted as well, they'll likely continue to explore that.
Like I've said, a big center with a strong two way game is something that's very highly coveted.
How much and when hes played center has been discussed a good bit in his thread. It was actually his natural position before his draft year I believe. I'm not sure it's fair to say that wing is even his natural position.
Adrian Dater @adater · 30s31 seconds ago
Per sources: Extent of Nathan MacKinnon injury won't be known til Monday back in Denver.
Interesting I suppose I am more uneducated on Rantanen then I thought.
I still feel he needs to play wing long term. Pretty funny that one of the main arguments against Boedker was that, albeit our second biggest position of need, we had that winger sitting in SA rotting. And now it seems that argument doesn't necessarily hold weight either if the Avs would rather him play center.
I just feel fairly strongly about constantly switching these guys. An argument can be made that Duchenes development was hindered at times because of it and the same argument can be made now on Mackinnon. Constantly switching back and forth. Now we are doing the same thing with Grigs and Rants?
Interesting I suppose I am more uneducated on Rantanen then I thought.
I still feel he needs to play wing long term. Pretty funny that one of the main arguments against Boedker was that, albeit our second biggest position of need, we had that winger sitting in SA rotting. And now it seems that argument doesn't necessarily hold weight either if the Avs would rather him play center.
I just feel fairly strongly about constantly switching these guys. An argument can be made that Duchenes development was hindered at times because of it and the same argument can be made now on Mackinnon. Constantly switching back and forth. Now we are doing the same thing with Grigs and Rants?
I think the Avs want versatility just like how they can have two guys take draws on a line. I don't know why Rantanen has been playing center but the coach flat out said the other day Colorado wanted him at center the rest of the season. I do think he looks best at RW and agree the best thing for him is to be comfortable at the NHL level but he's been playing center so he's used to that, now our two best centers went down. Who could have predicted that? We have to make due with whoever can play the position, I'm not even sure they could play 4 centers if he doesn't.
That's fine to have that opinion, but if they see potential at center in him with his defensive acumen combined with the fact that hes played center before being drafted as well, they'll likely continue to explore that.
Like I've said, a big center with a strong two way game is something that's very highly coveted.
How much and when hes played center has been discussed a good bit in his thread. It was actually his natural position before his draft year I believe. I'm not sure it's fair to say that wing is even his natural position.
I just feel fairly strongly about constantly switching these guys. An argument can be made that Duchenes development was hindered at times because of it and the same argument can be made now on Mackinnon. Constantly switching back and forth. Now we are doing the same thing with Grigs and Rants?
I think the Avs want versatility just like how they can have two guys take draws on a line. I don't know why Rantanen has been playing center but the coach flat out said the other day Colorado wanted him at center the rest of the season. I do think he looks best at RW and agree the best thing for him is to be comfortable at the NHL level but he's been playing center so he's used to that, now our two best centers went down. Who could have predicted that? We have to make due with whoever can play the position, I'm not even sure they could play 4 centers if he doesn't.
Dater saying it's likely a MCL injury to Mack.