- Feb 24, 2012
- 62,975
- 47,229
I mean what team has the depth to be ok with losing a top 5 player in the league?
Tampa could lose Kuch and still roll.
I mean what team has the depth to be ok with losing a top 5 player in the league?
I mean what team has the depth to be ok with losing a top 5 player in the league?
Tampa could lose Kuch and still roll.
Tampa could lose Kuch and still roll.
Agreed although I didn't think they looked great without Point in their first 3 games. May have been start of the season rust though.
We're in a better position with Kadri than compared to last year with Yeti/who else.If Mackinnon is out for a prolonged period Avs still don't have enough depth to overcome that
Still think the easiest solution is just to roll Zadorov as 1C
He'd probably do better than Jost lettuce be honest here.
Still think the easiest solution is just to roll Zadorov as 1C
He'd probably do better than Jost lettuce be honest here.
Speaking of Cale! Now would be a great time to showcase all that talent.Lettuce be honest? Kale would be better!
Speaking of Cale! Now would be a great time to showcase all that talent.
In before cgf posting:Sucks Mack might be out but Landeskog - Kadri - Rantanen will be a fun experiment.
Ryan Clark says Grubauer is expected to get the start by being first off the ice for the goaliesInjury can't be too serious if Mack is a game time decision.
He should play tonight and rest tomorrow.
Is Francouz playing tonight?
Ryan Clark says Grubauer is expected to get the start by being first off the ice for the goalies
Nobody knows. Gametime decision.Is Mackinnon playing tonight or no? Need to know for fantasy reasons
Is Mackinnon playing tonight or no? Need to know for fantasy reasons
Took a late dirty hip check from Hornqvist. They say it's just soreness. Probably has a huge bruise.What happened to MacK?