I’d switch Jost and NichushkinI'd rather have Donskoi on the 3rd line.
I'd not mind trying Calvert with Kadri and Compher on the 2nd line...the ultimate pest line. Man they'd be a pain to play against.
I disagree. I know most wants our top line back together but I much prefer to have one of these:I'd rather have Donskoi on the 3rd line.
I'd not mind trying Calvert with Kadri and Compher on the 2nd line...the ultimate pest line. Man they'd be a pain to play against.
I disagree. I know most wants our top line back together but I much prefer to have one of these:
Landy-Mack-Bura
Donskoi-Kadri-Mikko
Calvert-Jost-Compher
or
Donskoi-Mack-Mikko
Landy-Kadri-Bura
Calvert-Jost-Compher
I prefer the first one because Landy can take faceoffs for Mack but both are more balanced than:
Landy-Mack-Mikko
Calvert-Kadri-Compher
Donskoi-Jost-Bura
Landy - Mack - Rants
Donskoi - Kadri - Bura
Wilson - Jost - Compher
Calvert - Bellemare - Nieto
If/when everyone is healthy, I'd actually prefer Nuke to Wilson.Our "real" lines are:
Landy - Mack - Rants
Donskoi - Kadri - Bura
Wilson - Jost - Compher
Calvert - Bellemare - Nieto
I'm OK to go back to that when everyone is healthy if that ever happens again. Lines #1 and #4 are proven, you don't touch that. You can shuffle the middle 6 if need be.
The Kadri-JTC-Calvert would be just a fun experiment. Not long term stuff.
Dat playoff Wilson though. Lets be honest it's the only reason he's still on the roster.If/when everyone is healthy, I'd actually prefer Nuke to Wilson.
I disagree. I know most wants our top line back together but I much prefer to have one of these:
Landy-Mack-Bura
Donskoi-Kadri-Mikko
Calvert-Jost-Compher
or
Donskoi-Mack-Mikko
Landy-Kadri-Bura
Calvert-Jost-Compher
I prefer the first one because Landy can take faceoffs for Mack but both are more balanced than:
Landy-Mack-Mikko
Calvert-Kadri-Compher
Donskoi-Jost-Bura
Also Mack deserves to play with Rants at this point.I wouldn’t mind trying Landeskog and Kadri on the same line. I think those guys could really set a physical tone in the playoffs.
And I know balance is important, but I feel like Rantanen is just too good to be playing on a second line.
It would be more of a 1A and 1B kind of top-6. Not too many teams have the depth to defend against a balanced top-6 like those. It would also take pressure off our usual top 3 guys.I wouldn’t mind trying Landeskog and Kadri on the same line. I think those guys could really set a physical tone in the playoffs.
And I know balance is important, but I feel like Rantanen is just too good to be playing on a second line.
It would be more of a 1A and 1B kind of top-6. Not too many teams have the depth to defend against a balanced top-6 like those. It would also take pressure off our usual top 3 guys.
As long as the Avs have Nathan Mackinnon, they won't have a 1A 1B situation. Any line Mack is on is the number 1 line. Dude is absolutely our best player bar none.It would be more of a 1A and 1B kind of top-6. Not too many teams have the depth to defend against a balanced top-6 like those. It would also take pressure off our usual top 3 guys.