Weber, Keith and Chara for the Norris

pekkaslap

Registered User
Jul 8, 2011
429
0
He will finish third i think,but i didnt expect him to be a finalist at all given all the elitist media biases, great accomplishment for Webs. Proud of the Cap'n. I hope he wins one before he hangs it up.
 

pekkaslap

Registered User
Jul 8, 2011
429
0
There's a chart on the main board thread that illustrates how Keith doenst even draw the tough matchups on his own team, pretty sad that he will likely win it.
 

JamestheSame

Registered User
Apr 18, 2012
378
12
All of the finalists are great at what they do. I hope Weber wins but I'm not expecting it.
 

PredsV82

Trade Saros
Sponsor
Aug 13, 2007
35,490
15,770
to rephrase what has been said about Weber elsewhere, Weber didnt really turn it on until the second half of the season, whereas Keith had his big numbers early, and Im sure a lot of the reporters that dont pay attention to nashville anyway had already been thinking Keith all year long
 

nomorekids

The original, baby
Feb 28, 2003
33,375
107
Nashville, TN
www.twitter.com
to rephrase what has been said about Weber elsewhere, Weber didnt really turn it on until the second half of the season, whereas Keith had his big numbers early, and Im sure a lot of the reporters that dont pay attention to nashville anyway had already been thinking Keith all year long

If it were me, I would actually have Keith third, but I'm doing something that most of the talking heads don't--factoring in #fancystats.

At first blush, Weber's 50% Fenwick-For doesn't seem great, especially when Chara and Keith are both sporting 56%. HOWEVER, in context, Weber's deployment is only 27% offensive zone, compared to 36/37 for Chara and Keith, against overall tougher competition, and not to mention on a much worse team. Not to mention, Keith's slim lead on Weber comes in large part to the fast bulk(well over half) of his points coming from second assists--a product of the dynamic team he plays on. Weber also plays almost a full two minutes more per game.

I don't know what's going to happen...I was absolutely sure there was no way that Weber was going to miss, the last year that Lidstrom got the trophy as a retirement gift...but of these three, Weber SHOULD win. Slow start or not, his late December-April is probably the best I've ever seen a defenseman play in 30 years of watching hockey.
 

Montross

Askarov.
Oct 4, 2013
1,457
260
If it were me, I would actually have Keith third, but I'm doing something that most of the talking heads don't--factoring in #fancystats.

At first blush, Weber's 50% Fenwick-For doesn't seem great, especially when Chara and Keith are both sporting 56%. HOWEVER, in context, Weber's deployment is only 27% offensive zone, compared to 36/37 for Chara and Keith, against overall tougher competition, and not to mention on a much worse team. Not to mention, Keith's slim lead on Weber comes in large part to the fast bulk(well over half) of his points coming from second assists--a product of the dynamic team he plays on. Weber also plays almost a full two minutes more per game.

I don't know what's going to happen...I was absolutely sure there was no way that Weber was going to miss, the last year that Lidstrom got the trophy as a retirement gift...but of these three, Weber SHOULD win. Slow start or not, his late December-April is probably the best I've ever seen a defenseman play in 30 years of watching hockey.

Well said JN
 

PredsV82

Trade Saros
Sponsor
Aug 13, 2007
35,490
15,770
gotta gross feeling he takes it home this year.

he can only be denied so many times.

unless people are lying he will have to make up over 30 points in the remaining ballots that have not been publicly disclosed(not sure how many that is...)
 

Cashville

RIP Lindback
Apr 12, 2011
7,022
743
Denver
Unless my google-fu skills are lacking, I believe Weber is the 5th Norris finalist ever whose team did not make the playoffs; the last was in 1968.
 

Nashville Transplant

Registered User
Feb 28, 2013
754
2
Nash/LA
shocked, just shocked that Doughty wasn't a finalist :sarcasm:

I'm not shocked, but I am actually shocked that Pietrangelo was denied.

I did like Milbury and Jones just talking about Doughty's "Norris-like play" but it's tough to get into the top 3 when most of the writers are asleep by the time the western games conclude. Of course, Kopitar, Marleau and Getzlaf may disprove that.

That being said, if Chara was 6'4 he wouldn't even be in the discussion.

If voters got to see Weber play in his defensive zone consistently, they probably would have gone with Pietrangelo. But numbers don't lie. Shea earned the nod with the offensive numbers. Congrats to him.
 

Armourboy

Hey! You suck!
Jan 20, 2014
19,385
10,746
Shelbyville, TN
I'm not shocked, but I am actually shocked that Pietrangelo was denied.

I did like Milbury and Jones just talking about Doughty's "Norris-like play" but it's tough to get into the top 3 when most of the writers are asleep by the time the western games conclude. Of course, Kopitar, Marleau and Getzlaf may disprove that.

That being said, if Chara was 6'4 he wouldn't even be in the discussion.

If voters got to see Weber play in his defensive zone consistently, they probably would have gone with Pietrangelo. But numbers don't lie. Shea earned the nod with the offensive numbers. Congrats to him.

I would argue that Chara is the guy that shouldn't really be there, the other two I think you can make far better arguments for. Lets face it, its much like Lidstrom, he's there because of other reasons.
 

nomorekids

The original, baby
Feb 28, 2003
33,375
107
Nashville, TN
www.twitter.com
I'm not shocked, but I am actually shocked that Pietrangelo was denied.

I did like Milbury and Jones just talking about Doughty's "Norris-like play" but it's tough to get into the top 3 when most of the writers are asleep by the time the western games conclude. Of course, Kopitar, Marleau and Getzlaf may disprove that.

That being said, if Chara was 6'4 he wouldn't even be in the discussion.

If voters got to see Weber play in his defensive zone consistently, they probably would have gone with Pietrangelo. But numbers don't lie. Shea earned the nod with the offensive numbers. Congrats to him.

If they saw Weber play in the defensive zone consistently, they'd see that he's far above average there as well, and certainly comparable to either Doughty or Pietrangelo.

Just like with Keith and Chara, the 4-5 percentage point advantage they have on Weber in FF% - Close is pretty easily explained away by the fact that Weber a) averages 1-2 minutes more per game and also gets in the area of 10 % fewer offensive zone starts than Pietrangelo.

Oh, but right, Weber is -2, so he's a defensive liability.
 

triggrman

Where is Hipcheck85
Sponsor
May 8, 2002
31,758
7,540
Murfreesboro, TN
hfboards.com
If they saw Weber play in the defensive zone consistently, they'd see that he's far above average there as well, and certainly comparable to either Doughty or Pietrangelo.

Just like with Keith and Chara, the 4-5 percentage point advantage they have on Weber in FF% - Close is pretty easily explained away by the fact that Weber a) averages 1-2 minutes more per game and also gets in the area of 10 % fewer offensive zone starts than Pietrangelo.

Oh, but right, Weber is -2, so he's a defensive liability.
You should give up now, he only sees what he wants too. To him, Doughty is better, to 99% of the other hockey fans Weber is better.
 

Persona5

Registered User
Apr 22, 2013
1,722
38
Nashville
I'm just happy Suter isn't on this list and did anyone see Landeskog knock Suter on his but last night. I was laughing so hard.

As for Weber winning, he probably won't. For him to have the kind of year he had with the lack of forward support was amazing. Congrats to him for even making the list on a non-playoff team. That is like winning right there.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad