I don't think I'm trolling... I was asking serious questions. I noticed you decided to not answer any of them. Ok, that's your prerogative. But I guess you don't want to have an actual discussion about the play and just keep repeating the same thing.
But even though you didn't address a single question I asked, I'll do you the courtesy (which you didn't do me by the way) of addressing the points you make here:
- "Falls skate first on numerous occasions." The Fleury contact was not skate first; Kreider was still on his feet. And if you watch the play, he is pushed into Fleury from behind by Letang. Not to mention the contact is pretty minor if you actually paid attention to the replay. But let's not pay attention to details, I guess. The Andersson video shown here? Ok, yea - that is feet first. But are we going to ignore that his skates were taken out from under him by Methot? He was driving the net. This is his job. And his skates were taken out from under him, so he falls skate first into Anderson. Explain how this was avoidable other than Kreider purposefully neutralizing what he does well as a player.
- Even if we accept your premise that Kreider has some history of constantly running goalies skate first (which I'm not seeing - please feel free to provide proof of this though if you have it)... Are you implying that he has done any (all?) of them purposefully? You say you're not; but everything you write seems to indicate otherwise. The only other incidence of Kreider going legs first into a goalie was the Anderson contact. Which, while unfortunate, was far from purposeful. And I'm not quite sure how you're convinced that today's was purposeful either... If you watch the replay, you can see that the movement of Kreider's right leg is effected by the slash... it jerks back and/or catches an edge. This is not something that happens purposefully. You also see that as he's falling, he tries to initiate a stop; but because he had lost his balance at that point, he goes skates first into Price. Not seeing any intent in any of that play - other than the slash/trip.
I appreciate that. From what you've been posting on the main boards - and here - I had a very different impression of your position. I don't agree that it was reckless (I ask again: Would you want a Canadiens player to hold up on a breakaway because his skates might be taken out from under him?). But I at least get where you're coming from now, and you're entitled to your opinion, so ok.