I'm not sure, maybe some swedes are suffering from little brother complex towards the huge neighbour in east, Russia. ;-) Also there are lots of people in Sweden who prefer soft technical tactical SEL hockey (sometimes boring) over anything else, including the NHL and KHL. We also have a pretty strong national fan culture in Sweden, people who live for loving their teams and hating their opponents. They will probably have a hard time hating new teams from Russia and rest of Europe, it simply won't be the same hatred. ;-)
I would love a KHL league with the best teams from Europe.
Fantastic, and the only league who could make this dream come true is the KHL. We need the money from Russia. ;-)
I'm not sure if it would be a success or not but worth a try?
I agree with you.
It is naive to think that ET or "upgrade of ET" can be successfull in Europe. Especially if I read everywhere that clubs does not want to challenge KHL.. does not want to invest big money (because they dont have them). I would believe in ET project if biggest clubs like Eisbaren, Farjestad, HIFK etc came with budget over 25M euro (at least, better with over 40+). You know there are clubs with such budget in KHL...
Comparison with UEFA CL is a biggest mistake which can be made. Yes, CL is great idea but you need at least 3-4 league which are on same level ... the same level by quality of league and BUDGETS. This is not reality at all in hockey. Finnish and partly swedish clubs are not able to keep their best players (who does not sign in NHL), because they go to KHL... Look at FBK, they lost Salak and Lee, two good/best (?) players. It would not be problem if both signed with clubs playing ET.. but they signed in KHL. Maybe, maybe if FBK was in KHL, they would stay. At least, they would play the same league, the product of league would not decrease as it happened with ET after they leaving FBK.
As we know, many Euros playing in NA, not all have to play here. If they got paid at home, they would stay. Are ET clubs ready to attract them? What about KHL? One more time, you need big budgets to do so.
As I wrote, model with KHL as best euro league (including clubs from Germany etc) and ET as 2nd tier is acceptable for me. Honestly, I agree that Europe needs international competition, and not only a few clubs which joined/join KHL (Slovan, Lev, Riga, Minsk, Donbass, Jokerit). Look at football, there are clubs which play UEFA CL every year (like KHL) and 2nd tier clubs which play UEFA EL. There is only different in hockey, KHL is closed league and not fully developed. Barca, Real, MU, Bayern etc would create its own "KHL" if UEFA/FIFA was not so strong... IIHF is weak, so creating such league is possible. I see no problem here. On the other hand I understand fans which are against KHL.
What has been happening in european club hockey?
1) before KHL was created
national/domestic leagues existed, no international competition
2) KHL era
KHL was created with idea of
closed/paneuro league
ET was created with idea of
paralel/paneuro competition
Both KHL and ET have the same goal, to collect best euro clubs, to be best euro league/competition. I am convinced that league with more money/influence win the battle. Nowadays, KHL has more money/influence.
Lets have a look at North America. NHL existed for years, but WHA was created to challenge NHL, to be best league in NA or to merge with bigger/wealthier/established NHL (?). What happened? WHA clubs merged with NHL and WHA as league ceased.
Now back to Europe. What if, a few clubs of ET (biggest) merge/join KHL in future? Or vice versa, if ET has more money/power. I can imagine that best ET clubs join KHL in future. That does not have to mean that ET will cease, it would mean that their best club are not here anymore. De facto, ET is definitelly 2nd tier. I am sure guys from Gazprom/KHL has worked with such scenario...