GDT: WCSF - Game 1| Blues @ Avs| 8:30, TNT|

Status
Not open for further replies.

The Note

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 13, 2011
8,990
7,636
KCMO
1652794331144.png


Time: 8:30 p.m.
Location: Ball Arena
TV: TNT
Radio: 101 ESPN, Blues App

Series tied 0-0

:blues

*Projected lineups*
Schenn-O'Reilly-Perron
Buchnevich-Thomas-Tarasenko
Saad-Barbashev-Kyrou
Toropchenko-Bozak-Walker*

Leddy-Parayko
Rosen-Faulk
Mikkola-Bortuzzo
Perunovich*

Binnington

Scandella is skating, TBD if he's in. Walker likely out if they go 11F-7D again.

vs.

:avs

Nichushkin-MacKinnon-Rantanen
Landeskog-Kadri-Lehkonen
Burakovsky-Compher-Aube-Kubel
Helm-Sturm-O'Connor

Toews-Makar
Girad-Manson
Byram-Johnson

Kuemper

Blues have already lost in most people's view
tumblr_inline_p3w6f8hboy1r2xhmf_400.gifv


But all the pressure is on the Avs
200.gif


May as well ruin everyone's good time!
chappelles-show-the-playa-haters-ball.gif


 

Brian39

Registered User
Apr 24, 2014
7,140
13,104
I don't expect Colorado to look past us. I think they were guilty of that a touch last year against Vegas after a blowout game 1 win and then a close game 2 win. They went back to Vegas up 2-0 and then dropped 4 straight. They have spent the last 11 months dealing with the "can't get out of the 2nd round" narrative and I think they know that the head coach they like might not keep his job if they lose in the 2nd round again. MacKinnon is an intense guy and very clearly hates losing.

The pressure is on them and that could lead to mistakes, nerves, etc. But I expect them to be laser focused on this series and nothing beyond it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mk80 and JoshFromMO

Allens Five Hole

Registered User
Jan 17, 2017
234
235
We HAVE to get to first intermission down no more than 1 goal. Obviously it'd be nice to have a lead but we cannot have the series start like Nashville did. Get into that 2nd period we seem to love down a goal or less and I will feel relatively confident about our chances.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CoMoBlues

Brian39

Registered User
Apr 24, 2014
7,140
13,104
We HAVE to get to first intermission down no more than 1 goal. Obviously it'd be nice to have a lead but we cannot have the series start like Nashville did. Get into that 2nd period we seem to love down a goal or less and I will feel relatively confident about our chances.
I agree in order to win tonight. Coming back from a 2+ goal deficit after 20 minutes in Denver is exceptionally difficult.

But I don't think we need to win tonight to win the series. The core of this team has faced adversity and the story of the Cup Final was us responding to a couple blowouts with big performances. This team has an enormous amount of playoff experience. Beyond the 10 guys who were part of our Cup run, we've also got Cup experience from Leddy/Saad and Krug has been on a couple runs to the Final. There are plenty of voices in that room that understand that a series isn't won or lost in the first 20 or 60 minutes.

I'll feel relatively confident if we split the first 2 games in Denver. Doesn't matter which one and it doesn't matter how badly we lose the other. Make the series best of 5 with 3 games at the Enterprise Center and you're in good shape. I wouldn't declare us dead if we lose the first 2 games, but I certainly wouldn't feel confident. Pretty much have to win games 3 and 4 in that scenario though.

Vegas got absolutely waxed in game 1 in Denver last year. I was at the game and it was the most thorough playoff domination I've ever seen in person. Then Vegas came out strong in game 2 but lost in OT. Then Vegas won 4 straight to end it in 6.

This series is far from over if Colorado comes out and coasts to a big win.
 
Last edited:

Allens Five Hole

Registered User
Jan 17, 2017
234
235
I agree in order to win tonight. Coming back from a 2+ goal deficit after 20 minutes in Denver is exceptionally difficult.

But I don't think we need to win tonight to win the series. The core of this team has faced adversity and the story of the Cup Final was us responding to a couple blowouts with big performances. This team has an enormous amount of playoff experience. Beyond the 10 guys who were part of our Cup run, we've also got Cup experience from Leddy/Saad and Krug has been on a couple runs to the Final. There are plenty of voices in that room that understand that a series isn't won or lost in the first 20 or 60 minutes.

I'll feel relatively confident if we split the first 2 games in Denver. Doesn't matter which one and it doesn't matter how badly we lose the other. Make the series best of 5 with 3 games at the Enterprise Center and you're in good shape. I wouldn't declare us dead if we lose the first 2 games, but I certainly wouldn't feel confident. Pretty much have to win games 3 and 4 in that scenario though.

Vegas got absolutely waxed in game 1 in Denver last year. I was at the game and it was the most thorough playoff domination I've ever seen in person. Then Vegas came out strong in game 2 but lost in OT. Then Vegas won 4 straight to end it in 6.

This series is far from over if Colorado comes out and coasts to a big win.
Oh I agree with everything you said. When I mentioned being relatively confident about our chances, it was specifically about Game 1. I don't take any stock into what happens game to game aside from injuries. The Blues have shown they have a short memory regardless of the result and as long as they get 1 of the first 2, we're in a perfect position.

They always say a series doesn't begin until the home team loses.
 

mk80

Registered User
Jul 30, 2012
8,047
8,593
Let's Go Blues!!!

We need to survive the early blitz from the Avs! I'm fully prepared for the Avs to have moments where I go to a full clench, but the Blues have the tools to win the series!
 

PocketNines

Cutter's Way
Apr 29, 2004
13,312
5,364
Badlands
9-13 all time record in Game 1, Round 2:
2019 won 3-2 vs Dallas
2017 lost 4-3 in Nashville
2016 lost 2-1 in Dallas (but won series)
2012 lost 3-1 vs Los Angeles
2002 lost 2-0 in Detroit
2001 won 4-2 in Dallas
1999 lost 3-0 in Dallas
1998 won 4-2 in Detroit (but lost series)
1996 lost 3-2 in Detroit
1993 lost 2-1 in Toronto in double OT
1991 lost 2-1 vs Minnesota
1990 won 4-3 in Chicago (but lost series)
1989 lost 3-1 vs Chicago
1988 lost 5-4 in Detroit
1986 won 6-1 vs Toronto
1984 lost 2-1 in Minnesota
1982 lost 5-4 vs Chicago
1981 won 6-3 vs NY Rangers (but lost series)
1972 lost 6-1 in Boston
1970 won 3-1 vs Pittsburgh
1969 won 4-0 vs Los Angeles
1968 won 5-3 vs Minnesota
 
  • Like
Reactions: BluesTraveller

BlueMed

Registered User
Jul 18, 2019
2,804
3,328
9-13 all time record in Game 1, Round 2:
2019 won 3-2 vs Dallas
2017 lost 4-3 in Nashville
2016 lost 2-1 in Dallas (but won series)
2012 lost 3-1 vs Los Angeles
2002 lost 2-0 in Detroit
2001 won 4-2 in Dallas
1999 lost 3-0 in Dallas
1998 won 4-2 in Detroit (but lost series)
1996 lost 3-2 in Detroit
1993 lost 2-1 in Toronto in double OT
1991 lost 2-1 vs Minnesota
1990 won 4-3 in Chicago (but lost series)
1989 lost 3-1 vs Chicago
1988 lost 5-4 in Detroit
1986 won 6-1 vs Toronto
1984 lost 2-1 in Minnesota
1982 lost 5-4 vs Chicago
1981 won 6-3 vs NY Rangers (but lost series)
1972 lost 6-1 in Boston
1970 won 3-1 vs Pittsburgh
1969 won 4-0 vs Los Angeles
1968 won 5-3 vs Minnesota

How does this hold any significance to this team now?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BlueDream

mk80

Registered User
Jul 30, 2012
8,047
8,593
9-13 all time record in Game 1, Round 2:
2019 won 3-2 vs Dallas
2017 lost 4-3 in Nashville
2016 lost 2-1 in Dallas (but won series)
2012 lost 3-1 vs Los Angeles
2002 lost 2-0 in Detroit
2001 won 4-2 in Dallas
1999 lost 3-0 in Dallas
1998 won 4-2 in Detroit (but lost series)
1996 lost 3-2 in Detroit
1993 lost 2-1 in Toronto in double OT
1991 lost 2-1 vs Minnesota
1990 won 4-3 in Chicago (but lost series)
1989 lost 3-1 vs Chicago
1988 lost 5-4 in Detroit
1986 won 6-1 vs Toronto
1984 lost 2-1 in Minnesota
1982 lost 5-4 vs Chicago
1981 won 6-3 vs NY Rangers (but lost series)
1972 lost 6-1 in Boston
1970 won 3-1 vs Pittsburgh
1969 won 4-0 vs Los Angeles
1968 won 5-3 vs Minnesota
To this I refer you to Brett Hull's opening statement in this video



"We're here to prove the past is merely a point of reference, not a predictor of the future"
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad