vap0r
Registered User
- Jul 12, 2017
- 10
- 6
As a Pens fan I'm eager to see how Fleury plays. His playoff history isn't necessarily something to brag about.
He had two bad years in the playoffs. Other than that he's been fine.
As a Pens fan I'm eager to see how Fleury plays. His playoff history isn't necessarily something to brag about.
BUT THAT IS NOT. MY. POINT. I honestly feel like you guys are just messing with me at this point. ...
LA's banged up blueline is going to be the true deciding factor in this series. Vegas will have 30 Doughty-less minutes to do whatever they want out there.
Yup. We better pray that our forwards/centers make it easy on our non-Doughty pairings.
LA's banged up blueline is going to be the true deciding factor in this series. Vegas will have 30 Doughty-less minutes to do whatever they want out there.
I don't understand. You should explain yourself more.
I often as my MO send my messages mostly for other Kings fans to read. I don't worry too much or get caught up in fights with other posters from opposing teams. My team on ice usually does the talking for me. That's why I didn't reply directly to your message.
This series to me is very similar to the Kings 2012 series against New Jersey. Kings on the road. Some talented forwards sprinkled in amongst four effective lines. No standout defensemen; no standout weakness on defense. And MAF could play up to old man Brodeur's 2012 play. Neither team is quite as good as the 2012 team, maybe 80-90% as good. So I chose the same result, Kings in 6.
I have not been a believer in Vegas as a competitive team since opening night. I might as well stick to my position. Kings in a romp. 5 quick games.
The masses are in disagreement with the Vegas odds makers in a big way in this series.
They balance out the odds but they still indicate which team they feel is more likely to win. Otherwise the cost per 100 would be identical.That's because betting lines aren't odds. More people in Vegas are going to put money on the Golden Knights, because they're the higher seed and they're in Vegas. Sportbooks set the betting lines so that regardless of who wins the payout is the same. It has nothing to do with "odds" of winning and is solely about balancing the wagers.
They balance out the odds but they still indicate which team they feel is more likely to win. Otherwise the cost per 100 would be identical.
Yes i realize they don't care who wins but they still indicate a favorite.No, they indicate which team they think is going to receive more wagers. They don't care who wins, if they set the line correctly they make money regardless.
Yes i realize they don't care who wins but they still indicate a favorite.
Correct, all odds are the gamblers favorites, or perceived favorites.The gamblers' favorite. Which is obviously going to be the hometown team. It is not an indication of the likelihood of either team winning, it simply means that people in Vegas are putting their money on......Vegas, which should be a surprise to nobody.
Correct, all odds are the gamblers favorites, or perceived favorites.
All season? Series is split and the Knights losses were with a back to back after the trade deadline. If it were Minnesota, then I would agree.Bad matchup for Vegas. Vegas is good team but Kings have beat them all season
Read the SinBin, Twitter, Facebook Vegas fan pages go to CNA, go to actual knights games dressed in LA jerseys and get crap thrown at you. Shall I go on?
What % of the total wagers do you think will be made by visitors and residents of Las Vegas? I would think less than 2%.People in Vegas are betting heavier on the Golden Knights. That's all that means. It does not reflect the likelihood of either team winning and it should be obvious why it doesn't reflect the poll results.