Dan Patrick
Registered User
- Mar 11, 2020
- 1,961
- 1,959
I hope they take the 2 year option. Mete was a productive player on the Sens and would be a valuable asset at such a low salary if we decided to move on from him in the offseason.
I hope they take the 2 year option. Mete was a productive player on the Sens and would be a valuable asset at such a low salary if we decided to move on from him in the offseason.
If he's competing with them, then he's worth something in a trade!Two years means he has to be around when Sandy, LT, JBD are looking to earn spots …
If he's competing with them, then he's worth something in a trade!
He’s the furthest thing from an important piece, replace him with any of the dozen guys that are places on the waiver wire at the start of the season and the Sens are in no different situation. He’ll be battling for playing time on one of the worst current D in the league.Mete is an importance piece. Need to sign him for 2 years. If Sanderson or JBD develop faster then move him in year 2.
I would only sign Mete for one yr as a 7th D & insurance, but they could just as easily decide not to re-sign him & that would be fine too. They have MDZ for 2 yrs & Holden & J. Brown already signed for this yr, although a lot could depend on how those three play & if they are still decent NHL players. I expect that over the next 2 seasons they should have Sanderson, LT, JBD & Kleven challenging for roster spots & Mete, Holden & J. Brown are all UFAs who could all be dealt by the TDL. Should be interesting what happens with this defence over the course of next season.
I think Mete is looking for a 1 way.. I am sure he's take close to league minimum but he wants a 1 way
By the way, what’s Mete’s value on the trade market?
By the way, what’s Mete’s value on the trade market?
To be fair, Reilly was on the verge of getting waived when we picked him up and he returned a 3rd and signed a nice extension (for him, idk that the Bruins get value out of it).
By the way, what’s Mete’s value on the trade market?
I hope they take the 2 year option. Mete was a productive player on the Sens and would be a valuable asset at such a low salary if we decided to move on from him in the offseason.