Unfortunately I can't sign into HFBoards at work, so most games I won't be on. Glad to see the caps fight through a horrible period and get a road win vs a good playoff capable team.
In regards to the lack of guys on this board, while I agree some of it has to do with the lack of interest with the regular season (lets be honest, this is a 82 game pre-season for a lot of us). But I do think there are some things this board could do to help stimulate the conversation.
I don't know why we have the limit on threads. We have a game thread, roster thread and NHL thread. Most active boards let members start a lot more than that. With all the conversations getting jumbled into a couple huge threads its hard to keep it going. Why not have a thread talking about Orlov, one on MoJo, one on the PP ect.. Its easier to follow and helps stimulate a lot more conversation then just two massive threads. Just a thought.
The site isn't stifling conversation by confining discussion. Our other OT threads are also less active because people aren't stopping by or posting as much. Mods have actually been pretty hands-off for a while now.
People are sitting on their hands as they always do the year after there are high expectations and another let down. GDTs at this time last year had post totals in the 200s to 300s. That didn't increase much unless there was a testy opponent or playoff matchup. It's been that way for years now (looking at the GDTs back to 2013) and I expect it to be similar this season.
Interest probably won't intensify until there's a storyline beyond "Caps on cruise control until another likely playoff choke".
- What stars are currently on fire?
- What new, hot prospects are tearing things up and generating conversation?
- What scandals and roster battles are taking place?
- How much Orpik vs Orlov talk can we really sustain?
The fact is Caps management have broadcasted their 2 year plan and have stuck to it SO predictably that there's not much room for any kind of speculation. 14th forward? That's our biggest point of contention? There's nothing there, and there won't be until something unexpected happens.
Regarding the thread topics, we do have player threads but people either don't use them or they all eventually become the same, overlapping commentary anyway. You can't have an Orlov thread without it becoming an OrPIK thread. The Mojo thread becomes a Wilson thread. Etc. Then people lose track of who they were talking to, points get repeated, misunderstandings occur, flame wars start, etc. Have you read the main/trade/prospect board player threads?
DD said:
The megathreads have been a source if contention for many years, but I'm a lot less active than I used to be for other reasons. There's a persistent negative tone to the conversation here that really wears on me after a while. Unfortunately that starts with leadership.
This forum has also fallen into a weird groupthink attitude that is unwelcoming to outsiders and new opinions.
Too bad HF is the only highly active NHL forum around.
I still really like the GDTs, but I don't know how you guys keep fighting the same fights over and over in the megathreads without going nuts.
We try not to go full megathread unless we have to. Mods have not been merging any threads because people have not been starting them, and it's been this way for a long time. This is a small fanbase that likes things a certain way and relies on a few people to drive most of the conversation. If we want more action we have to generate it ourselves or bring in more people who will contribute positively without fear of being attacked. We have codified this in our local rules and work toward it daily. We can only do so much as "leadership".
Ideally it's a balance between some degree of orderly discussion and freedom to stimulate conversation. It's not a site management problem at the moment, it's what the users (including me) are doing with the topic. There's not a lot to work with. For various reasons I'm not as into the nuts and bolts as I usually am but I still try to stimulate conversation by posting hypotheticals. That's only good for so much, and it often results in me being told I'm "reaching" or "reading too much into it", but it's something to talk about, right?
Ultimately this is a free site with volunteer "leadership" and user generated content. If we want a more entertaining board then we have to make it more entertaining ourselves (without getting banned pls thx).