I don't think they will make any trades until the off-season.
I don't see why not. I'm sure we'll see at least a few consideration trades before the end of the season.
The Predators struck a number of deals prior to their expansion draft (which took place on June 26, 1998).
http://prosportstransactions.com/ho...8-10-09&PlayerMovementChkBx=yes&submit=Search
Prior to selecting their team, they signed free agents Rob Valiceciv, Jayson More, and Mark Mowers. They also acquired a number of players for "future considerations" which were agreements not to take specific players.
The Kings sent prospects Kimmo Timonen, Marian Cisar and a couple of other players (Jan Vopat and Vitali Yachmenev) in order for the Predators to pass on selecting Jere Karalahti and to select a goalie instead, which would protect the Kings from losing a goalie in the next expansion draft.
Going to be interesting to see how many of these types of deals Vegas will be able to make between the trade deadline and their expansion draft.
Because teams will want to wait until they're 100% sure of who they will have/want to protect, which won't occur until the off-season.
i.e: you don't have to protect a pending UFA, and a team might not be sure which pending UFA's they will re-sign. Teams might also still be weighing whether to protect 4 D & 8 skaters, or 3 D & 10 skaters, etc yet.
These are exactly the types of deals that are going to go down.But if a team can come to an agreement on compensation for Vegas to not draft a specific player early (or to draft a specific player early) it makes it easier for them to shape their roster for the rest of the season.
For example: Minnesota doesn't want to lose a defenseman so they offer to leave Zucker unprotected and a 3rd round pick for Vegas to not select one of their defensemen. Now they can trade a D for a forward and know they won't lose another D in the expansion draft. (This is a completely hypothetical proposal not created for actual consumption.)
Vegas picks up the phone to try and acquire the rights to Ilya Kovalchuk from the Devils.
I don't see why not. I'm sure we'll see at least a few consideration trades before the end of the season.
Why pay assets to protect a player you may get a better offer to trade .
Example
TML has a boat load of good young players that are exempt but the need a good D and has the room to protect 1
The Ducks ave too many player to protect and could uses A good young forward . So why are the Ducks going to trade an asset which I am sure would be decent as their D are good when they could trade that D to the TML for a young exempt asset . Both teams win
The Predators struck a number of deals prior to their expansion draft (which took place on June 26, 1998).
http://prosportstransactions.com/ho...8-10-09&PlayerMovementChkBx=yes&submit=Search
Prior to selecting their team, they signed free agents Rob Valiceciv, Jayson More, and Mark Mowers. They also acquired a number of players for "future considerations" which were agreements not to take specific players.
The Kings sent prospects Kimmo Timonen, Marian Cisar and a couple of other players (Jan Vopat and Vitali Yachmenev) in order for the Predators to pass on selecting Jere Karalahti and to select a goalie instead, which would protect the Kings from losing a goalie in the next expansion draft.
Going to be interesting to see how many of these types of deals Vegas will be able to make between the trade deadline and their expansion draft.
Anyone remember if selections like Krupp, Richter, and Iafrate were swing for the fences and hope they sign or were they calculated acquisitions based on draft pick compensation when they signed elsewhere as UFA's
God this expansion is going to make the offseason fun, yet stressful.