BorzNYI
Registered User
- Mar 27, 2012
- 160
- 0
Am I missing something with how twitter works. Did McKenzie say it or was it some nobody MikeinBuffalo
looks like he said these comments on TSN radio in Toronto.
Am I missing something with how twitter works. Did McKenzie say it or was it some nobody MikeinBuffalo
looks like he said these comments on TSN radio in Toronto.
Just insane how little Wang cares about winning. Unfortunately until he breaks the rules the NHL is powerless.
Someone help me out. How does it jive that Wang was willing to pay top dollar to retain Vanek but not a couple of bucks to secure a better deal trading him? The two scenarios seem completely contradictory.
Someone help me out. How does it jive that Wang was willing to pay top dollar to retain Vanek but not a couple of bucks to secure a better deal trading him? The two scenarios seem completely contradictory.
Someone help me out. How does it jive that Wang was willing to pay top dollar to retain Vanek but not a couple of bucks to secure a better deal trading him? The two scenarios seem completely contradictory.
Wang will be forced to increase payroll for next season, but he isn't forced to increase payroll now. The team is on a shoestring budget, and it's really obvious. This is a team that brought in a goalie that never played for us solely for his cap hit not that long ago.
Some portion of what we gave up in assets to get Vanek was due to Buffalo retaining salary. We also, if the information being discussed is true, reduced the competition for Vanek's services by not being willing to take on salary in some way from cap tight teams.
Initially, I thought the results of the Vanek to Montreal trade were simply due to Snow overplaying his hand - the hand he said he would play (waiting until the last moment to trade Vanek.) I couldn't believe that was said to begin with. Since it appeared that more players were becoming available, it's pretty obvious that a deal needed to get done earlier instead of later. If salary exchanging hands was also a factor, I'm not surprised at all by the return we received.
We are the Mickey Mouse Club until we see this team increase payroll beyond the minimum. Right now, it seems like we're simply going to tread water until Brooklyn or a sale (or both.)
Don't spend a dime on this team directly. Get your tickets on StubHub. Wait a year or two to buy merchandise. Everyone buy something the day this team is sold.
,
Mitch
Incorrect about me not being truthful. As a matter of fact, I couldn't be telling the truth any more than I am. I wouldn't be selling my soul just to break into a business I enjoy. I guess I would call that integrity. Some have it and some don't. Maybe we can refer to some of those who don't as sell outs? And no drama here, son. Just calling a spade a spade. I already do what I enjoy doing with even more irons in the fire...and I did all of that without having to compromise who I am. Amazing, huh? It is clear to all that the isles gm cannot say that. This is why I sleep well at night haha! I could care less if he does or not
I still don't get what this "selling your soul" drama is? Nobody is doing anything illegal here. I'm calling a spade a spade too, Drama Queen...
Someone help me out. How does it jive that Wang was willing to pay top dollar to retain Vanek but not a couple of bucks to secure a better deal trading him? The two scenarios seem completely contradictory.
We won't have a pick next year.
Wang doesn't care
The way Wang sees it is that Garth saved him some money; because he doesn't have to pay Vanek's salary for the next two months.
Someone help me out. How does it jive that Wang was willing to pay top dollar to retain Vanek but not a couple of bucks to secure a better deal trading him? The two scenarios seem completely contradictory.
Does he not realise a winning team will create more money in the long run?Wang cares about how much money he's losing first, icing a competitive team second. Once the Lighthouse referendum failed, he basically threw up his hands and quit.
Charles Wang has been the equivalent of a slumlord. He does the bare minimum to put a team on the ice.
Does he not realise a winning team will create more money in the long run?
Does he not realise a winning team will create more money in the long run?
Exactly Long Island has a passionate fan base they've just been so alienated by ownership and management that I don't even blame them for not showing up. A lot of people here in Canada just look at the islanders attendence a d say "oh look another American market that doesn't care" I always say that's not the case in Long Island. I actually wish it would happen here in Edmonton to send a message but the problem here is even when the hockey fans get fed up and stop going there's enough casual fans who just wanna go out and see a game that will still pay top dollar to do so because the economy is so good here plus the season ticket holders don't want to give up their seats on the off chance the team does become good again and they'd be back in the queu of the 17000 person waiting list.For a guy who built a business, you would think he could understand that concept. Plus, last year in the playoffs, the Barn was packed, people were spending on concessions, merchandise etc. He needs to hire a hockey guy to make him understand.
For a guy who built a business, you would think he could understand that concept. Plus, last year in the playoffs, the Barn was packed, people were spending on concessions, merchandise etc. He needs to hire a hockey guy to make him understand.
While I agree Mitch, I am unhappy about him taking the revenue sharing check while saving dough at the expense of improvement as in this case with the Vanek deal. I don't expect the revenue committee to do what they are supposed to do, but it sure would be nice if they did climb into Wang's accounting, publicly, and came down on him for taking their money while starving this club out of greed.