GFS
Registered User
- Apr 12, 2010
- 3,003
- 265
I have allowed 5 choices for this one in case you want to combine the Sedins into one.
Last edited:
Bure Sedins Linden
If we count the Sedins as one, then Bure Sedins Linden and Luongo
I feel like you could get away with one Sedin face and call it both of them
reminder that Naslund played 11 seasons and won a Lindsay in Vancouver
Bure played 5.5 seasons.... his two 100 point seasons were in very high scoring seasons.
As we come down to the last few teams- just wanted to thank @GFS for sticking with the Mount Rushmore idea, despite there being scares of it not continuing after a short break.
Surprised to see so many Bure over Naslund picks considering he played 300 less games for Vancouver, and put up about the same amount less points. I guess people nostalgic for how dynamic he was.
so youre defining someones legacy based on 3 playoff games. Brilliant.reminder that bure never was held to two assists over the last three games of a seven game series
so youre defining someones legacy based on 3 playoff games. Brilliant.
k, well I think playing 11 seasons, 4 as one of the league's best players, is more of of an accomplishment than what Bure did in his 5.5 seasons in VAN.well, i mean if he’d actually done something there he would have a legacy right? (see @tarheelhockey ‘s post above)
or maybe if he didn’t go scoreless against LA’s backup with the hart/ross/rocket/division on the line a month earlier
k, well I think playing 11 seasons, 4 as one of the league's best players, is more of of an accomplishment than what Bure did in his 5.5 seasons in VAN.
Naslund still had 25P in 27GP int he playoffs at the peak of the dead puck era (01-04). Bure had great playoff numbers too, but all in a much higher scoring era (91-95).different goalposts for different folks
agree to disagree