Jannik Hansen
Registered User
- Apr 16, 2016
- 764
- 1,368
What ?? Watch
Didn't see anything in that video that was as bad as the OEL trade. Can you point out what I'm missing?
What ?? Watch
Vlasic was elite when he signed his deal ? I'd like to see a sharks fan verify that.
Your bullet points negate nothing. Chiarelli, Botteril and Doug Wilson were worse.
Ekman-Larsson efter oväntade utköpet: "Jag blev förvånad"
Oliver Ekman-Larsson hade fyra år kvar på sitt kontrakt med Vancouver Canucks. Att bli utköpt var inget han såg framför sig. – Nej, det var en överraskning. Man har ju lite möten och sådant efter säsongen så jag trodde faktiskt inte att det skulle hända. Jag blev förvånad, säger han till...hockeynews.se
Wants revenge, will look for another NHL gig and wants to prove any doubters wrong.
The hockey player has a restriction on movement that engineers, HR specialists and other professionals don't have. They can quit and go elsewhere for higher pay any time they like.The NFL has no guaranteed contracts. In hockey, the player sits at home getting fair compensation doing nothing while the team is stuck with a caphit for x amount of years. Companies will terminate employees because of poor performance and the fired staff getting very little. How is this fair to you? What does a hockey player have that an engineer, HR specialist or even other any other profession doesn't?
OEL says all the right things and then does none of them on the ice. He took a giant dump all over the Canucks for putting their faith in him, gets a massive buy out and now wants revenge? Revenge on what? Playing terrible? Perhaps he'll get his revenge by returning some of those many millions he did nothing to earn.Ekman-Larsson efter oväntade utköpet: "Jag blev förvånad"
Oliver Ekman-Larsson hade fyra år kvar på sitt kontrakt med Vancouver Canucks. Att bli utköpt var inget han såg framför sig. – Nej, det var en överraskning. Man har ju lite möten och sådant efter säsongen så jag trodde faktiskt inte att det skulle hända. Jag blev förvånad, säger han till...hockeynews.se
Wants revenge, will look for another NHL gig and wants to prove any doubters wrong.
While that would be milding amusing, it's not going to happen because OEL is no longer a decent hockey player. He had so many chances to do what you're suggesting he might do, while being two years younger and he showed almost nothing. I don't get this idea that he was ever decent on the Canucks. The best he showed would be a bottom pairing guy who needed to be sheltered. He was pampered and given every opportunity to play well on the Canucks and he didn't.It's going to be fun if OEL comes back healthier and ends up signing with a deeper team for a reasonable price and fills a bunch of really solid #3/4D sort of minutes.
Curious to see which teams are interested, and which teams OEL is interested in signing with now that he's out on the open market. He'll probably get scooped up by Florida and promptly have a massive career resurgence on a cheap deal. Basking in the sunshine, out of the spotlight and pressure, with a fresh start and a ton of money in his pocket. St.Louis, Washington, or Long Island would be my other next guesses.
I think that had more to do with the league perception of the Canucks and being cap strapped. The other GM's smelled blood and tried to take advantage of a cap strapped team. Garland may be over paid by $500k or so but what he brings to the table definitely has value. I think with OEL gone and Van opening up cap space, they wont get backed into a corner and could make some decent hockey trades hopefully involving Myers, Garland and Beauvillier. Alternatively, get rid of Myers and Beau and keep Garland until year - maybe he bounces back under Tocchet.I like garland myself, I think he should and will have value in a year when the cap jumps up. Fact of the matter is our opinions are just that, opinions.
Garland was made available for free yet he is still a Canuck. That means he is at best a no value winger. If he had value, at least 1 of the other 31 GMs would have taken him for future considerations. Instead, the Canucks had to buyout OEL since they didn’t wanna attach assets to ditch Garland.
Hopefully both of us are right and if he is moved, it’s next year when his value should be at its peak as a Canuck
I've said I agree Garland is a good player that should have value, but it wasn't teams trying to take advantage of the Canucks. Look at the trade market for wingers. Colmbus only got a 3rd + 4th for Bjorkstrand whom was coming off a 28 goal, 57 point season signed for 5.4M x 4. Buchnevich returned a 2nd + a 4th liner in Blais coming off a 20 goal 48 point season in 54 games.I think that had more to do with the league perception of the Canucks and being cap strapped. The other GM's smelled blood and tried to take advantage of a cap strapped team. Garland may be over paid by $500k or so but what he brings to the table definitely has value. I think with OEL gone and Van opening up cap space, they wont get backed into a corner and could make some decent hockey trades hopefully involving Myers, Garland and Beauvillier. Alternatively, get rid of Myers and Beau and keep Garland until year - maybe he bounces back under Tocchet.
Garland and Myers for Comtois and Henrique (as mentioned on the Canucks board)
While that would be milding amusing, it's not going to happen because OEL is no longer a decent hockey player. He had so many chances to do what you're suggesting he might do, while being two years younger and he showed almost nothing. I don't get this idea that he was ever decent on the Canucks. The best he showed would be a bottom pairing guy who needed to be sheltered. He was pampered and given every opportunity to play well on the Canucks and he didn't.
That said, some team will most certainly take a flyer on him for his past and bad both the Coyotes and the Canucks have been for the last decade, but he'll shame them for giving him the opportunity. He's no better than Dekeyser was in his try out with the Canucks last season.
Indeed, I am exaggerating (in particular with the Dekeyser comparison), but I never expected OEL to be a big point producer (others may have) because that wasn't going to be his role.I think you're really rewriting history here with this. OEL wasn't productive because as most people anticipated...he had no real PP opportunity with the Canucks, behind Hughes who is much better at the same role. But he was surprisingly solid defensively that first year with the Canucks. He played well in some pretty tough minutes, while dragging the Chaos Giraffe around with him.
Last season, he looked clearly injured from the beginning of the year. His mobility was never great with the Canucks or those last years in Arizona, but last season it was clearly degraded significantly from the time camp broke right up until he disappeared onto the IR. It's possible he just completely fell off a cliff...but it seems a lot more reasonable that he was trying to play through some sort of nagging injury, to have dropped off so suddenly in that regard over the course of a summer.
He was absolutely in a different stratosphere of performance from DeKeyser's tryout. DeKeyser was just completely broken and useless for every single second of that endeavor. The fact OEL looked a little bit like that toward the end of his Canucks tenure before going on the LTIR is really just more indication that OEL wasn't healthy last year. Comparing the two is a huge exaggeration.
Indeed, I am exaggerating (in particular with the Dekeyser comparison), but I never expected OEL to be a big point producer (others may have) because that wasn't going to be his role.
Personally, Myers dragged OEL up to being decent (as we all know, Myers does have these runs of games where his upside is apparent before he once again completely forgets how to play defense and goes back into the toilet) as much as the opposite, and the that was absolutely peak OEL.
I never agreed with this idea that OEL was reliable at all and that he was playing a sound game. He was certainly better for a period of time before he fell apart, but I think the previous years in the desert suggests that was predictable. His body (like Dekeyser's), is giving up the ghost and whatever his game is, it's not playing defense first, which is the role he's been slotted into.
I think people keep looking for reasons to explain why this once very high end player has turned into a marginal bottom pairing player. The Canucks defense, when he was with the team, was historically bad, and he played a very large role in that.
Anyway, I hear where you're coming from, and I've read the same over the years on the Canucks boards ... I just find it it far too forgiving for how OEL performed. My view is no doubt influenced by never wanting him on the Canucks, and then watching Benning spend two seasons landing him with one of the dumbest trades in league history ... and then watching him be so ineffective while he was with the team.
I'll be incredibly surprised if he finds any kind of sustained renaissance on a different team.
I think you're really rewriting history here with this. OEL wasn't productive because as most people anticipated...he had no real PP opportunity with the Canucks, behind Hughes who is much better at the same role. But he was surprisingly solid defensively that first year with the Canucks. He played well in some pretty tough minutes, while dragging the Chaos Giraffe around with him.
Last season, he looked clearly injured from the beginning of the year. His mobility was never great with the Canucks or those last years in Arizona, but last season it was clearly degraded significantly from the time camp broke right up until he disappeared onto the IR. It's possible he just completely fell off a cliff...but it seems a lot more reasonable that he was trying to play through some sort of nagging injury, to have dropped off so suddenly in that regard over the course of a summer.
He was absolutely in a different stratosphere of performance from DeKeyser's tryout. DeKeyser was just completely broken and useless for every single second of that endeavor. The fact OEL looked a little bit like that toward the end of his Canucks tenure before going on the LTIR is really just more indication that OEL wasn't healthy last year. Comparing the two is a huge exaggeration.
Two spot on excellent posts BT.While we disagree on how effective OEL was at his peak with the Canucks and whether he was carrying Myers or vice versa...i think we do agree on the principle that the trade never made any sense, precisely because of the bolded. Shoehorning him into a defensive role just never made any sense. That's never been his game and was especially not something i'd have expected him to find any success in whatsoever, as he's clearly lost a step.
That's where i really do think he's got a chance to see a significant resurgence...if he's careful and deliberate with his chosen landing spot. If he ends up in a place where he can be a #4D and also get himself significant powerplay time...i do think he'll rebound and look very reasonably competent again. If he can get back to that role he was successful in and doesn't have the weight of $7M expectations on his shoulders.
Whether he chooses his new team wisely or not...will significant impact how well i expect his "revenge season" to go.
Ekman-Larsson efter oväntade utköpet: "Jag blev förvånad"
Oliver Ekman-Larsson hade fyra år kvar på sitt kontrakt med Vancouver Canucks. Att bli utköpt var inget han såg framför sig. – Nej, det var en överraskning. Man har ju lite möten och sådant efter säsongen så jag trodde faktiskt inte att det skulle hända. Jag blev förvånad, säger han till...hockeynews.se
Wants revenge, will look for another NHL gig and wants to prove any doubters wrong.
Yes, we're certainly on the same page with the very odd decision to pursue OEL, leaving aside the crazy price paid. Square pegs and round holes and all that.While we disagree on how effective OEL was at his peak with the Canucks and whether he was carrying Myers or vice versa...i think we do agree on the principle that the trade never made any sense, precisely because of the bolded. Shoehorning him into a defensive role just never made any sense. That's never been his game and was especially not something i'd have expected him to find any success in whatsoever, as he's clearly lost a step.
That's where i really do think he's got a chance to see a significant resurgence...if he's careful and deliberate with his chosen landing spot. If he ends up in a place where he can be a #4D and also get himself significant powerplay time...i do think he'll rebound and look very reasonably competent again. If he can get back to that role he was successful in and doesn't have the weight of $7M expectations on his shoulders.
Whether he chooses his new team wisely or not...will significant impact how well i expect his "revenge season" to go.
The Canucks are a shit show With some of the dumbest people in NHL management running things. Like Kevin Lowe levels. When you have Bruce Boudreau shitting on them on the TDL show you know it’s bad.OEL says all the right things and then does none of them on the ice. He took a giant dump all over the Canucks for putting their faith in him, gets a massive buy out and now wants revenge? Revenge on what? Playing terrible? Perhaps he'll get his revenge by returning some of those many millions he did nothing to earn.
They've got 4 years of runway with Hughes. Trade Pettersson (and Miller) now, and you might be competitive by 2025 with the picks & prospects you get today.