kegstandbyme
Registered User
Before making any sort of proposal, I want to see how the fans who watch him regularly value him.
Except we kind of do have a way to replace him. The Joey we saw this past regular season... give Turris his icetime and linemates, and bam, we've replaced him. Turris probably would have outscored him, actually. He wouldn't have brought some of the other occasional physical attributes. But he can replace the downside of Joey easily enough. It's just that occasional tantalizing upside that he can't replace...Unless we go full rebuild Joey isnt going anywhere. Despite what we think of him we have no way to replace him right now so you would just be shipping him out to ship him out.
If he could replace him Poile would be trying to move Joey and not Turris and save 2 million in cap hit.Except we kind of do have a way to replace him. The Joey we saw this past regular season... give Turris his icetime and linemates, and bam, we've replaced him. Turris probably would have outscored him, actually. He wouldn't have brought some of the other occasional physical attributes. But he can replace the downside of Joey easily enough. It's just that occasional tantalizing upside that he can't replace...
That's what I said. But it's always a tradeoff. If you can get a significantly better return trading one than the other, then you open up the potential to addresss the "more than points" side of the equation in other ways. Turris can replace Johansen's points, or near enough, of that I'm confident. And then with $8M in cap space freed up we can sign two good defensemen, or one Pietrangelo, etc. (At least we can try to). Or you get a good D back in the trade for Johansen. Whichever. So you get a little softer at 1 position in the lineup, but potentially make your team better overall. Any options that make the team better need to be considered. There are ways that Turris replacing Johansen can result in the team getting better, even if the 1-to-1 comparison between the two is slightly uneven. Poile should be trying to move BOTH of them so that if he does get any interest in both he can do the tradeoff analysis.If he could replace him Poile would be trying to move Joey and not Turris and save 2 million in cap hit.
There is more to playing hockey than points, I think we tend to forget that around here.
It's funny, I read that and the first paragraph actually made Johansen sound really good to me. And then the conclusion didn't seem to fit!This year just only looking at centers league wide he was 66th in the league, last year his 64 points placed him at 35 the year prior his 54 points put him 40th. In his full 4 full seasons here he has 215 points that places him 36th among forwards in the league in that 4 year span. This represents a 53 point average per year that he has been here. Now we can fool ourselves all we want but those are not 1C numbers in this league on a top team.
Johansen had issues before he got here and he still has issues. Motivational issues being the most glaring he has the skills to be much much more but he has been a drag on both Forsberg and Arvy both those guys should be close to a point a game.
If Poile can find Johansen a home it would be better for this team.
The entire lineup struggled to produce this year, so laying that all on Johansen is a stretch.It's funny, I read that and the first paragraph actually made Johansen sound really good to me. And then the conclusion didn't seem to fit!
It's funny, I read that and the first paragraph actually made Johansen sound really good to me. And then the conclusion didn't seem to fit!
and the second line then became the expensive odd parts bag line with three playmakers and no one to finish and score.
Maybe so, but he's what we've got for now. A team with Duchene and Turris as our centers is just going to get pushed around. At least Joey can lean on people when he decides he wants to.One of the most overpaid centers in the league, now only justified by inexplicably continuing to put up numbers in the post-season. If only...
As a player who was always of the "talented, but not talented enough to not work my ass off" variety, I hear you. Far cry from the types of players this org used to be known for.Maybe so, but he's what we've got for now. A team with Duchene and Turris as our centers is just going to get pushed around. At least Joey can lean on people when he decides he wants to.
Joey's issue is want too, and it always amazes me how a guy with that much drive initially just loses it.
This year just only looking at centers league wide he was 66th in the league, last year his 64 points placed him at 35 the year prior his 54 points put him 40th. In his full 4 full seasons here he has 215 points that places him 36th among forwards in the league in that 4 year span. This represents a 53 point average per year that he has been here. Now we can fool ourselves all we want but those are not 1C numbers in this league on a top team.
Johansen had issues before he got here and he still has issues. Motivational issues being the most glaring he has the skills to be much much more but he has been a drag on both Forsberg and Arvy both those guys should be close to a point a game.
If Poile can find Johansen a home it would be better for this team.
And yet Granlund, Smith, and Turris would normally account for about 55 goals and 140 points a season. Even if they weren't or haven't lived up to that the past season or two, that's not production/talent that's going to be simple to replace. It also probably, if via UFA, isn't going to come much less expensive than they were.You say this about Joey, what do you say about Duchene? Does he move up to #1 with 42 pts this yr. Turris was worse. Who would be our #1C? We aren't getting McDavid, MacKinnon, Draisaitl, Mathews or anyone like this! So would it be? Malkin may be on the block but he is 34 yo. or Kopitar but he is 33 yo. We aren't getting any new young 1C for Joey or Duchene or Turris or any combination of. With Granlund, Smith and hopefully Turris leaving that should free up some $$ to fill a few spots with some needed UFA's along with some of our own younguns, that should give the preds a good team this next year.
Agreed but I think part of the problem is that the pieces just didn't fit. Too many pass first guys, and too many soft guys.And yet Granlund, Smith, and Turris would normally account for about 55 goals and 140 points a season. Even if they weren't or haven't lived up to that the past season or two, that's not production/talent that's going to be simple to replace. It also probably, if via UFA, isn't going to come much less expensive than they were.
Yeah, I agree. It's why I'm kind of wary to see the roster turnover that's probably about to happen. I know that it's needed and that there are definitely some structural/chemistry issues, but we're about to lose two talented, productive players for nothing (who will undoubtedly bounce back into better form) and giveaway/buyout a 3rd. It's slightly appalling that the feeling on the boards seems to be trending toward "good riddance" cause it's actually rather a bit tragic.Agreed but I think part of the problem is that the pieces just didn't fit. Too many pass first guys, and too many soft guys.
In their defense though, Lavi offered the forwards little consistency. The only ones that got any at all was the Bonino line. Heck he even basically got pressured into playing Turris.
And yet Granlund, Smith, and Turris would normally account for about 55 goals and 140 points a season. Even if they weren't or haven't lived up to that the past season or two, that's not production/talent that's going to be simple to replace. It also probably, if via UFA, isn't going to come much less expensive than they were.
I get you but I see it more as the pain incurred for past mistakes.Yeah, I agree. It's why I'm kind of wary to see the roster turnover that's probably about to happen. I know that it's needed and that there are definitely some structural/chemistry issues, but we're about to lose two talented, productive players for nothing (who will undoubtedly bounce back into better form) and giveaway/buyout a 3rd. It's slightly appalling that the feeling on the boards seems to be trending toward "good riddance" cause it's actually rather a bit tragic.
I think trading for Granlund, signing Duchene and moving Subban was his hail marry. I think now he's hoping a retool of young guys will reignite some things. If not, well it was a good run.It's too bad in hindsight that we couldn't have been in a "Seller" mode at the Trade Deadline. Just before the Covid bomb dropped. But it's like so many things that are stacked up against us now... AT THE TIME... that's our companion preface to IF ONLY...
At least recouping something for Smith and Granlund would have helped cushion the blow. It's not quite so tragic to just decide to let Smith go, however. He's a decent player, I attach no "good riddance" to letting him walk. But the time has come for bigger changes, and that just happens to coincide with his contract expiring, so that's just how it goes. Granlund and Turris... very few in the hockey world criticized those trades when they were made. Obviously if we had Fiala and Girard now, however... well.
Ultimately I think it all just adds up to the justification for this being Poile's Last Stand. I would have taken all those trades he made too. I guess you never want to leave on a bad note, but if he doesn't have any Hail Mary up his sleeve, then I think he should just resign next summer. He tried, I give him that. Sometimes you just have to admit failure. If you're a 70-year old millionaire, well, it's a pretty soft landing to just retire and enjoy the rest of the string.
I probably would still try for the Hail Mary if I was him, however. I mean, why not. Let the next guy put the Killer-T's (Tolvanen,Trenin,Tomasino) into the lineup all at once and really go hardcore on the rebuild. If this is your Hail Mary, go down shooting. That might not be the best for our franchise, of course. But that's what I'd do in Poile's shoes.