- Nov 17, 2011
- 7,658
- 2,536
You would have asked the same about Vegas or Seattle just a few years ago. I just think it would be a positive move for the NHL to relocate a couple of small Canadian markets that just don't bring much to the NHL overall to bigger US markets. 2 small Canadian markets that don't seem very conducive to the idea of building their existing NHL teams new arenas so the outcome most likely will be relocation.
The difference here is that both Portland and Houston have arenas already. It is very unlikely that the taxpayers build a new arena in either market just for a hockey team. Therefore, the most likely buyers would be
...the owner of the arena in Portland, which in undetermined due to Paul Allen's death
and
....Fertitta, the owner of the Rockets, who control the arena in Houston, and is on record as saying "it would be an ok idea, but it has to fit with the business plan, because hockey struggles south of the Mason-Dixon line"
And, for this cause, it's a valid question. Now to compare with Vegas/Seattle.....
In both case you have a privately financed arena, and the hockey ownership was involved in the building. That would work in either city, if someone wants to make the investment. However, both places are different from Vegas and Seattle, in that Seattle had NO arena, really. And Vegas is Vegas....