Funny side thought. How many times has a teams last pick been better than it's first I wonder?
For the Kings it's happened three times by my count. In 1969 they took Butch Goring with their final pick in the fifth round, who'd last 1100 games in the NHL and win four cups with the Islanders. He was certainly better than their first pick that draft, Dale Hoganson, who still stuck around for 343 games.
Dave Taylor just misses the cut. Taken 210 in the fifteenth round in 1975, he'd play 1111 games, all for the Kings and was an important part of the famous Triple Crown Line. The lowest drafted player to hit 1000 points. Certainly better than Tim Young, their first round pick, who was no slouch either with 628 games and a couple of nice seasons. But LA had to ruin it by drafting Bob Shaw, Taylor's teammate at Clarkson University, who never made the NHL with the 215th pick in the draft.
I thought Luc Robitaille would be a fit here, as I was certain he put up better numbers than whoever they took first that year. But I didn't realize the Kings took four more players after Robitaille at 171 in 1984, drafting all the way up to 232.
Kimmo Timmonen just misses here too. I had forgotten the Kings even drafted him, 250th in the 10th round in 1993. He certainly turned out better than Shane Toporowski, but the Kings were determined to draft everyone with a pulse that year, taking Patrick Howald at 276.
In 1999, 250th pick Noah Clarke actually made the NHL and managed 21 games, whereas their first pick in the draft, Andrei Shefer managed zero.
And finally in 2013, all signs point to 191st pick Dominik Kubalik being a better player than Valentin Zykov, taken in the second round at 37. Mat Roy in 2015 certainly has a shot to do the same.
So I count three times where it's clear for the Kings, with a lot of close calls. And worst of all, a lot of years where neither their first pick or their last pick in a draft managed any NHL games.