I think that's the real kicker is that Letang has done what he has in his career without ever having a legitimate top four defenseman on his side outside of Martin for like a year.
Doughty has Muzzin
Keith has Seabrook
Karlsson has Methot
Letang has.. Eaton.. Orpik at 34.. uh?
He's better than most people will ever care to admit, haters here and hates outside of the fan base. It's so clear when he's hurt and out long term that he's one of the biggest driving forces on the Penguins. When Sid or Geno are hurt, the team adjusts and plays a tighter game to make up for the loss of offense and they're now better equipped to handle the losses with better depth.
But with Letang, you lose him and you see just how weak the depth is and also just how important he is to the team's entire make-up/style/everything.
In terms of importance for me, it's Letang, Crosby, then Malkin. By who you lose and how it hurts the team.
I think that's the real kicker is that Letang has done what he has in his career without ever having a legitimate top four defenseman on his side outside of Martin for like a year.
Doughty has Muzzin
Keith has Seabrook
Karlsson has Methot
Letang has.. Eaton.. Orpik at 34.. uh?
This and PP are the reasons why he has not become the best d-man in the league
Karlsson is the best offensively - That's about ****ing it.
Doughty is fairly solid offensively and defensively but he's good at both, not exceptional at either.
Keith is amazing at the defense part of the game, offensively he's fairly good.
Letang is exceptional offensively, just under Karlsson, and he's on the level of Doughty and just under Keith defensively.
To me it's Keith, Letang, Karlsson, and then Doughty. That's not even being some homer about it, that's looking at each players skills and what they bring to the table. I like Doughty, but I feel like he gets sheltered by his partner a lot as well, Letang is switched with partners so often he rarely gets that benefit, when he messes up, it's more visible it seems. Karlsson is always anchored with a stand out defensive defenseman and Keith is always with a guy that covers his ass too.
Letang? Not so much.
This and PP are the reasons why he has not become the best d-man in the league
We're also relying on Pouliot to ease the pain of Letang ever being hurt or adding support.
It's a reality that exists in an alternate universe.
So I put my hopes in Dumo and Maatta and pray Daley doesn't get hurt.
I think that's the real kicker is that Letang has done what he has in his career without ever having a legitimate top four defenseman on his side outside of Martin for like a year.
Doughty has Muzzin
Keith has Seabrook
Karlsson has Methot
Letang has.. Eaton.. Orpik at 34.. uh?
Disagree. I mean sure to an extent... but we have 3 other solid top 4 guys in Maatta, Dumoulin and Daley - all of whom can move the puck. And we have Daley, Pouliot and Schultz who can take his place on the PP.
Don't get me wrong, losing Letang hurts, but it's not like we're dependent on DP to cover for him if he does miss a game.
Barring any late changes, nine of the 24 players on the tournament roster will be free agents on tryouts. Odds are that few, if any, will own a pro deal by the end of the weekend, but all would like to earn at least a longer look in training camp that begins next week.
Because the Penguins have six players participating in the World Cup tournament, there will be a few extra spots open on the camp roster.
“Especially up front, there’s going to be more opportunities to bring more of these players to main camp if they perform well,” Botterill said.
Six of the nine free agents are forwards; the other three play defense, where prospects might have the best chance of forging a long-term relationship with the organization.
A few years ago, the Penguins’ talent pipeline was clogged with promising young defensemen, but that surplus has disappeared.
So, while management was happy to lure highly regarded free agents Ethan Prow and Lukas Bengtsson a few months ago — “I’m really excited to see how they perform in this tournament,” Botterill said — the organizational depth chart on defense still can be fleshed out a bit.
That’s good news for tryout candidates Brandon Crawley, Dawson Davidson and Gabriel Sylvestre.
“We’ll certainly be looking at them closely to see if they’re players we want to sign,” Botterill said.
Contracts always "look" better overtime due to cap inflation and raising premiums for Free agents. At the time the contract was signed it was viewed pretty widely that it was a big set of shoes for him to fill. That's all I meant by bringing up good or bad contract. NOW I'm happy with the deal, and the fan base pretty much as a whole views it as at worst a neutral deal now. I was only looking back at initial reactions with that point.Based on the contracts other top D are signing, I'm more than happy with his contract. Is it Josi great? No. But it's far from a bad contract. He's a number 1D getting paid on the lower end of the scale of what those guys get paid.
most underrated player in the entire league...
I wouldn't go that far but he's definitely gone from being a guy that was mentioned in Norris discussions and looked to as "one of those guys," to falling off the radar a bit and being underrated / harshed on too much sometimes (not just in here). Which is fine, underrate him all they want, take off some pressure. Who cares. Better for Letang.
what's surprising to me is that he was underrated even by Pens fans. I remember half a year ago the majority in here wanted him traded. which is funny, because the team looks like crap when he's not playing.
The endless Letang debate. I thought we all agreed the best way to judge the current NHL defenders is a tier system? Here is a post from that debate just a few months ago.
Tier 1: Keith, Doughty, Karlsson.
OEL/Hedman/Subban/Letang all get to this level, but to actually stay on Tier 1 is doing it night in/night out. It's such an elite status. IMO the 3 I mentioned are building to be HOF players.
Tier 2: OEL, Weber (who stays consistent here), Letang, Subban, Hedman, Gio, Josi, Piets.
I think OEL and Weber stay at that elite Tier 2 status the most while IMO Hedman/Letang/Subban show they have more potential but fail to secure that consistency. Letang puts on another season like he just did and stays healthy... and he's there.
Tier 3: Burns, Carlson, Suter, Seabrook, McDonagh.
I'm sure I'm missing some, but this would be the tier 3 of solid elite defenders. Maybe add Vlasic and a few others to this one. These guys are solid top players but don't have that next level elite status or have inconsistencies that keep them down. Burns has the highest potential out of these guys. Seabrook is probably the most deserving for his insane consistency.
JW, I think Burns has elite potential, but he is more boneheaded than Letang. He was brutal at times in the SCF and also brilliant at times in the postseason. He is so up and down. His inconsistencies, for me, are what keeps him out of a Tier 2 level.
I understand what you are saying about his high level of play, but his lows are crazy low, too. Being put with guys like Suter, McDonagh, Seabrook ain't so bad.
I'd argue that Burns plays defense about as well as Karlsson, even with his boneheadedness. Their offensive production is now pretty close. If Karlsson is in tier 1 on his offense then Burns is at least tier 2 based on his own.
The thing that bugs me about Letang, is that he has one boneheaded moment per playoff series. Game 5 of ECF. Game 3 of SCF. Against Washington where he took a risky hit that didn't need to happen since we were already under the microscope. I remember against the Isles a few years ago, he kept trying to stick the puck out of the air instead of using his hand... then does the same thing later in the series, too.
He's Tier 1, for me, if his bad games weren't complete and utter vomit-inducing efforts of boneheaded mistakes as opposed to just having a regular bad game because bounces didn't go his way. And Tier 1 means he's arguable one of the top 3 defenders in the league, so that's very high praise.