ZDH
Registered User
- Mar 6, 2008
- 8,892
- 3,997
29-27 Dawson?
somebody said Narimani won round 3? Interesting
yea Dawson winced when he heard it too, I laughed
29-27 Dawson?
somebody said Narimani won round 3? Interesting
Was interesting.29-27 Dawson?
somebody said Narimani won round 3? Interesting
Was interesting.
I personally scored it 30-26.
Dawson is the real deal.
I liked how he said he wants to be a “company” man.I had 30-26 too. He sure is, pretty good on the mic after too. Seems to have some charisma. Could be looking at a future star
You don't score for defense:So you agree that Jackson should of scored something for all the successful defences.
PRIORITIZED CRITERIA:
Effective Striking/Grappling
“Legal blows that have immediate or cumulative impact with the potential to contribute towards the end of the match with the IMMEDIATE weighing in more heavily than the cumulative impact. Successful execution of takedowns, submission attempts, reversals and the achievement of advantageous positions that produce immediate or cumulative impact with the potential to contribute to the end of the match, with the IMMEDIATE weighing more heavily than the cumulative impact.” It shall be noted that a successful takedown is not merely a changing of position, but the establishment of an attack from the use of the takedown. Top and bottom position fighters are assessed more on the impactful/effective result of their actions, more so than their position. This criterion will be the deciding factor in a high majority of decisions when scoring a round. The next two criteria must be treated as a backup and used ONLY when Effective Striking/Grappling is 100% equal for the round.
So judging by that, he had very few successful takedowns, using the criteria, and in a whole on the ground if the fight was judges for the whole 15 minutes, the other fighter was better on the ground.You don't score for defense:
So judging by that, he had very few successful takedowns, using the criteria, and in a whole on the ground if the fight was judges for the whole 15 minutes, the other fighter was better on the ground.
And on atleast half of those "takedowns" jackson got up almost instantly.P sure he got credited with 8 takedowns
fight isn’t judged on the whole unfortunately and Johns was better in the last two rounds w the grappling. I wish it was scored on the whole....Max would be champ if that’s the case
And on atleast half of those "takedowns" jackson got up almost instantly.
Well, fights aren't judged for the whole 15 minutes. They are judged round-by-round.So judging by that, he had very few successful takedowns, using the criteria, and in a whole on the ground if the fight was judges for the whole 15 minutes, the other fighter was better on the ground.