UFC betting scandal (fighters barred from associating with James Krause, Jeff Molina suspended)

CDJ

Registered User
Nov 20, 2006
55,066
44,188
Hell baby
You can't really make injuries public in MMA prior to a fight and we know many of these guys have preexisting injuries from camp, those injuries would definitely be targeted. I think Dillashaw disclosing his injury to the ref prior to the fight was good enough but based on what we saw, he should have backed out. Usman comes to mind the first time he fought Masvidal.

I don't actually see the bets Krause made going 8 for 8. Were they all on his fighters or against his fighters? They need to make an example of him for sure if they have the evidence.
They weren’t all his fighters, as a matter of fact looking at the 8 bets now I’m pretty sure none of them were his fighters

He’s pretty good at breaking down fights, I think that was just a pretty easy card to bet. I’m on an all time cold streak and I even won money that card (before immediately losing it all back and then some on this last card)
 

pistolpete11

Registered User
Apr 27, 2013
11,594
10,402
I still think TJ was delusion and wanting a paycheck. Maybe there's some evidence that he or his team is involved in betting, but I haven't seen it.

With Krause, this is why other sports banned betting a looooong time ago. Even if he didn't do anything (which seems very unlikely at this point), the optics are terrible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CDJ

td_ice

Peter shows the way
Aug 13, 2005
33,004
3,569
USA
$100 bet would've paid out $50,000.

Not sus at all.
I think it was a couple years ago, a poster on here picked 11 fights, 11 wins. I wish I would have commented on it, at the time. (I doubled check time stamp, and no edit of the post). But I did not.
 

m9

m9
Sponsor
Jan 23, 2010
25,107
15,229
The most interesting piece of the Krause picks to me is two picks on Spivac, even though the fight didn't happen.

We know Lewis pulled out with some sort of illness/medical thing, could that have gotten out?

I'll say it again, the biggest thing that could come of this might be some coach betting ring that involves Krause and others where the teams trade information so they all know who to bet on. Then you wouldn't have to bet on your own fighters, you could bet on fighters from other camps. Like one of those revenge movies where two people go after the other's enemies to stay hidden in plain sight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chaels Arms and CDJ

pistolpete11

Registered User
Apr 27, 2013
11,594
10,402
The most interesting piece of the Krause picks to me is two picks on Spivac, even though the fight didn't happen.

We know Lewis pulled out with some sort of illness/medical thing, could that have gotten out?

I'll say it again, the biggest thing that could come of this might be some coach betting ring that involves Krause and others where the teams trade information so they all know who to bet on. Then you wouldn't have to bet on your own fighters, you could bet on fighters from other camps. Like one of those revenge movies where two people go after the other's enemies to stay hidden in plain sight.
Frankly, as long as they aren't throwing fights like they essentially did with Minner, I wouldn't even care. The only people they are really screwing over are the sportbooks who make money hand over fist. They're just dummies for getting caught. Edit: I guess if they are giving out their fighter's injury details without them knowing, that's pretty f***ed up, though it seems like Minner was probably in on it in this case.

I don't know how you really stop it. Stuff is always going to get leaked. I'm sure it does in the stick and ball sports as well but 1) it's way more of an impact when it is 1-on-1 physical combat and 2) you don't have coaches talking about betting out in the open in those sports. If it wasn't for the optics, I don't think the UFC would really care. They will make an example of Krause and pretend like it was 1 bad apple. Just like the NBA did with Tim Donaghy. If there are other guys, they will tighten up and operate more in the shadows. The next controversy will come along and everybody will move on.

Looking forward to the 30 for 30 in a few years, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: m9

CDJ

Registered User
Nov 20, 2006
55,066
44,188
Hell baby
I think it was a couple years ago, a poster on here picked 11 fights, 11 wins. I wish I would have commented on it, at the time. (I doubled check time stamp, and no edit of the post). But I did not.
Spoiler alert it wasn’t me

The most interesting piece of the Krause picks to me is two picks on Spivac, even though the fight didn't happen.

We know Lewis pulled out with some sort of illness/medical thing, could that have gotten out?

I'll say it again, the biggest thing that could come of this might be some coach betting ring that involves Krause and others where the teams trade information so they all know who to bet on. Then you wouldn't have to bet on your own fighters, you could bet on fighters from other camps. Like one of those revenge movies where two people go after the other's enemies to stay hidden in plain sight.
To be fair I also made those Spivac bets, he was a considerable favorite
 
  • Like
Reactions: m9

Bunk Moreland

Registered User
Mar 16, 2010
15,590
1,179
Long Island
I could be wrong but I think there's a big difference between TJ and Minner. I don't recall there being a massive line movement with TJ I'm pretty sure his team somehow kept it quiet or at least kept their bets low key.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CDJ

MD thaivuN

Anime Music Hipster
Aug 2, 2012
8,330
3,902
Montreal
www.youtube.com
I think it was a couple years ago, a poster on here picked 11 fights, 11 wins. I wish I would have commented on it, at the time. (I doubled check time stamp, and no edit of the post). But I did not.

This is probably the closest I'll ever be to a perfect win prediction hahaha

23441-595271.png
44634-1263549.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: td_ice and m9

m9

m9
Sponsor
Jan 23, 2010
25,107
15,229
Yeah, I have no doubt that Krause (and many other people) have had great nights betting MMA. I know that "picks list" from Krause got posted on Twitter like it's some smoking gun but it's nothing. You can be assured they've got much more evidence than that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CDJ

m9

m9
Sponsor
Jan 23, 2010
25,107
15,229
Decent info here,



Thanks for posting - I had meant to watch this and then completely forgot. Good recap for those who haven't really been paying attention. If you have been paying attention, not much new info here.

I know Dana has been pissy at Ariel again this week and you wonder if this video has something to do with it. Dana White is super arrogant and dismissive in this in regards to the original betting situation with Minner. He also shows a fundamental misunderstanding of how betting works, which is kind of crazy for someone who has done his share of gambling/betting and has basically lived in/around here in Vegas half his life. Bad look for Dana overall.

They play some of Ariel's interview with Krause and I wonder if something Krause said might end up being a bit of a bigger deal. He mentions that he "makes bets for other people" or "goes on their account" or something like that. Wonder if this is as simple as he's making bets under other people's accounts to skirt limits or even to collect bonuses, which betting companies could easily catch if he's making the same bets everywhere all the time. This would explain the Minner line moving so much as well if he had a bunch of accounts he was pushing money through within a couple hour period.
 

pistolpete11

Registered User
Apr 27, 2013
11,594
10,402
Thanks for posting - I had meant to watch this and then completely forgot. Good recap for those who haven't really been paying attention. If you have been paying attention, not much new info here.

I know Dana has been pissy at Ariel again this week and you wonder if this video has something to do with it. Dana White is super arrogant and dismissive in this in regards to the original betting situation with Minner. He also shows a fundamental misunderstanding of how betting works, which is kind of crazy for someone who has done his share of gambling/betting and has basically lived in/around here in Vegas half his life. Bad look for Dana overall.

They play some of Ariel's interview with Krause and I wonder if something Krause said might end up being a bit of a bigger deal. He mentions that he "makes bets for other people" or "goes on their account" or something like that. Wonder if this is as simple as he's making bets under other people's accounts to skirt limits or even to collect bonuses, which betting companies could easily catch if he's making the same bets everywhere all the time. This would explain the Minner line moving so much as well if he had a bunch of accounts he was pushing money through within a couple hour period.
Dana's clearly just trying to down play this as much as possible, but it is kind of strange that he's pretending like there is nothing here. I think he would be better off trying to frame it as 1 rogue coach/fighter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CDJ

m9

m9
Sponsor
Jan 23, 2010
25,107
15,229
Dana's clearly just trying to down play this as much as possible, but it is kind of strange that he's pretending like there is nothing here. I think he would be better off trying to frame it as 1 rogue coach/fighter.

In his defense (kind of) the clip I was referencing was from a couple of weeks when the Integrity group was first investigating the issue, it's not from now.

But that being said, you can go back to the Lemos/Rodriguez thread (or other places online, I'm sure) and see that right away people thought something was up. White's kind of a "stupid or liar" thing to me here.. he either truly believed nothing happened which is incredibly stupid.. or he's just straight up lying to protect his brand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pistolpete11

pistolpete11

Registered User
Apr 27, 2013
11,594
10,402
In his defense (kind of) the clip I was referencing was from a couple of weeks when the Integrity group was first investigating the issue, it's not from now.

But that being said, you can go back to the Lemos/Rodriguez thread (or other places online, I'm sure) and see that right away people thought something was up. White's kind of a "stupid or liar" thing to me here.. he either truly believed nothing happened which is incredibly stupid.. or he's just straight up lying to protect his brand.
Dana is a lot of things, but stupid isn't 1 of them. Especially when it comes to gambling, as you pointed out before, something he's been around his entire career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: m9

chicagoskycam

Land of #1 Overall Picks
Nov 19, 2009
25,582
1,834
Fulton Market, Chicago
chicagoskycam.com
I think Dana kept referring to one large better that was refused at a Sportsbook vs the overall movement of the line prior to the fight. I didn’t really care for the dismissive attitude, he should had said we take this very seriously and if it’s proven, we will take action. He acts like this isn’t a problem but again, his tune has probably changed since then.

The interview with Krause was a bit disturbing. He mentioned the discord channel being his primary source of income and that be barely makes any money as a coach. Placing bets for people. It’s clear he was more motivated by his betting gig. These guys have so much insider info so I’m sure he hasn’t been the only one.
 

m9

m9
Sponsor
Jan 23, 2010
25,107
15,229
Well, better late than never.

I wonder if eventually we'll find out why most people were so slow on this one. UFC/Dana White said it's nothing, okay. Protect the brand.

But the MMA media for the most part went radio silent and didn't comment on it. I like MMAFighting and listen/read to some of their stuff, but they basically ignored it or said it was nothing. They weren't the only ones. But yet people online were able to figure it really quick? I get there's a difference between being some guy online and actually reporting on something, but it's really weird how almost nobody would talk about it or was even willing to give a real opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16Skippy

pistolpete11

Registered User
Apr 27, 2013
11,594
10,402
Well, better late than never.

I wonder if eventually we'll find out why most people were so slow on this one. UFC/Dana White said it's nothing, okay. Protect the brand.

But the MMA media for the most part went radio silent and didn't comment on it. I like MMAFighting and listen/read to some of their stuff, but they basically ignored it or said it was nothing. They weren't the only ones. But yet people online were able to figure it really quick? I get there's a difference between being some guy online and actually reporting on something, but it's really weird how almost nobody would talk about it or was even willing to give a real opinion.
Luke Thomas talks about it a lot, but MMA media is very access based. Nobody wants to stick their neck out and piss of the UFC, Dana, coaches, managers, fighters, etc. because then they can't get the interviews or whatever else.

I think Krause is pretty well liked throughout the industry, so it's better for most of them to just shut up and see what happens. Don't want to be critical and then end up being wrong.
 

DingerMcSlapshot

Registered User
Dec 1, 2017
1,340
856
Dana should be investaged in match fixing. Too many bad decisions to be coincidence. UFC has turned into a joke.
 

CDJ

Registered User
Nov 20, 2006
55,066
44,188
Hell baby
Explains why he’s not fighting Jimmy Flick soon. Molina is a good prospect and a fun fighter. Would be a shame if he did something stupid to put an end to his career
 
  • Like
Reactions: m9

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad