I didn't address it because I already had and you simply weren't satisfied with my response.
No. You didn't.
Gleisan Thibeau has a better and more successful wrestling background than Ferguson does and he has fought Khabib.
Khabib was 0 for 13 in his takedown attempts against Tibau.
Tony, who also fought Tibau, stuffed Tibau's only takedown attempt, then took him down himself, and submitted him in the first round.
What does that mean, Coach?
So Khabib is going to have a hard time getting Ferguson down and keeping him down, even though a far inferior wrestler to him in Kevin Lee took Ferguson down more than once and even mounted him at one point.
I don't see how saying Tony is a better wrestler than anyone Khabib has faced (except for Tibau, I guess) and thus could be harder to take down than his previous opponents isn't a valid point. So what if Lee was able to slip a punch and take Tony down? Lee's got some wrestling, too, and if it was him on the verge of fighting Khabib, he'd be the (second) best wrestler that Khabib has faced in the UFC. It doesn't mean Tony would out wrestle Khabib. It just means it's not going to be quite as easy for Khabib...or at least it stands to reason.
Since you ignored it last time I will bring it up again, if you don't believe me you can take Ben Askren's word for it.
I don't see how Ben Askren, talking in generalities, saying what we already know has anything to do with a potential fight with Tony. Yeah, Ben, we know. Khabib's a really good wrestler.
Khabib has every bit the endurance, pace, and durability that Ferguson does....
But please, tell me again about Ferguson's impressive wrestling background and how he's a ''national champion wrestler.
See, this is where you are completely missing the point. I'm not saying that Tony is better than Khabib or is going to beat Khabib. I'm saying he's better than anyone Khabib has faced in the UFC which makes for a really interesting fight. Yeah, maybe he wouldn't be the best striker, but he just f***ed up some pretty good strikers in his last 2 fights. He'd only be the second best wrestler he would have faced. He'd probably be the best BJJ player. He's got a chin. He's got a gas tank. He's got good hands, elbows, knees, kicks. He doesn't really have any major weaknesses. His biggest weakness might be that he's wild sometimes and gets hit, but that unpredictability is also a strength. Add it all up and he's the best and most complete fighter that Khabib would have faced.
Ferguson is a much better technical striker than Khabib, but it won't matter when he gets taken down like everyone else. That is the point that you keep missing or choosing to ignore.
As I've said numerous times, I think Tony being a better wrestler than anyone Khabib has faced (except of course Tibau) gives him the ability to stuff more takedowns than most of his previous opponents. The more time he can keep it on the feet, the better his chances are. If (and most likely when) Khabib does get him down, he can use his wrestling to get back up like Raging Al did. The differences being, Tony is a better wrestler, bigger, stronger, more explosive, and won't be fighting him in a 5 round fight on a day's notice. Or Tony can use his BJJ to either catch Khabib in something or make him defend those submissions which could give him an opening to get back to his feet.
Edit: Also as I've said numerous times, I'm not saying these things are going to happen. I'm saying they are realistic possibilities that prevent it from being a foregone conclusion that Khabib wins like you are saying.
. People were saying that Khabib would just take Tony down and smash him like everyone else. I said not necessarily. Although, it is certainly a possibility. 
