Midship
Registered User
- Jan 7, 2016
- 2,961
- 2,240
Or we can blame both, because both were shit.Don’t blame him. Blame the top line that hasn’t done donkey dick all series
Or we can blame both, because both were shit.Don’t blame him. Blame the top line that hasn’t done donkey dick all series
Or we can blame both, because both were ****.
When you light the other goalie up like they did and then your goalie let's up a goal that's questionable
Well I'm a Flyers fan. Rask is batter than any goalie we have had in 30 years. He played great in the playoffs. But I'm gonna be honest he blew it. They were good shots, but Boston had great shots. He did it against Chicago and he did it tonight. Thats 2 times in a row the biggest games of his career he just wasn't good enough. He is very very good, but he has to make a save. When you light the other goalie up like they did and then your goalie let's up a goal that's questionable and then another you have to save, its over. It was over at 2-0, trust me like I said im a Flyers fan i know how it changes the team when they are dominating then your goalie let's in a crap goal. Sorry guys I was rooting for you.
I don't think people realize how difficult it is to penetrate a defensively minded team like the Blues when you gift them a 2-0 lead so early. It's not as simple as "where did he offense go?" Yes, it's not all on one person, but Rask deserves the most blame for Game 7.
Such a stupid post.
Rask haters can eat their asses.
Deflected, but when through the five-hole with his stick out of position.Guess you didn't notice it was deflected.
Anything that means he doesn't have to lay blame at Bergeron.
Rask let in 4 goals, Rask didn't lose them the game. The team lost.
As a diehard Price fan, I can empathize with Rask fans. He played well enough to win. Always gives his team a chance to win, but the guy at the other end made more saves tonight. Switch goalies and St. Louis still wins the Cup. He's a great goalie.He'll unfortunately get an even worse rap because of tonight. Two lucky goals when they only had 5 shots in the period... Just **** luck.
He got us to game 7 of the Finals. Any talk of him being a choker should be put to rest but unfortunately it won't. His run this year was just as good as Thomas in 2011... Just without the ending.
1st line lost that series. People want to blame someone for that Cup loss, it’s on them. Blaming Rask is a stupid take.
Congrats you just proved you dont know jackshit about being a goalie. You cant grasp the concept why deflection goals often go in? Its because the goalie was poised to make the save as if the shot was not deflected and by the time its deflected its sometimes too late to react.Deflected, but when through the five-hole with his stick out of position.
Difficult save? yes, but certainly not an impossible save
View attachment 236085
LolCongrats you just proved you dont know jack**** about being a goalie. You cant cant grasp the concept why deflection goals often go in? Its Its bec the goalie was poised to make the save as if the shot was not deflected and by the time its deflected its sometimes too late to react.
You do know that even if a puck is deflected, a goalie can still make a save. Right? Especially that one.Guess you didn't notice it was deflected.
Congrats you just proved you dont know jack**** about being a goalie.
Dispite which team wins the game 7 there should not be any competition for the Conn Smythe. Winner is Tuukka in any case - and it´s not even close.
Deflected, but when through the five-hole with his stick out of position.
Difficult save? yes, but certainly not an impossible save
I am saying it was a saveable tip shot, I am not saying it was a soft goal, or even a weak goal, saveable.You don't cover the five hole if the shot is not heading there. A deflection from that range makes any save a matter of puck luck as there's no time to react.